1 2025:CGHC:22128 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCRC No. 3726 of 2025 Durgesh Suryavanshi S/o Duryodhan Suryavanshi Aged About 19 Years R/o Chingrajpara, Guru Ghasidas Chowk, P.S. Sarkanda, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. ... Applicant versus State of Chhattisgarh Through P.S. Sarkanda, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. ... Non-applicant For Applicant : Mr. Satyendra Shrivas, Advocate. For Non-applicant/State : Mr. Arvind Dubey, Govt. Advocate. Hon'ble Mr. Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Order on Board 20.05.2025 1. This is the first bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for grant of regular bail to the applicant who has been arrested in connection with Crime No. 1583/2024 registered at Police Station Sarkanda, District Bilaspur (C.G.) for the offence punishable under Sections 21 and 22 r/w Section 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985. 2. As per the prosecution's story, from the possession of co-accused ABHISHEK SHRIVAS Digitally signed by ABHISHEK SHRIVAS Date: 2025.05.21 12:26:35 +0530 2 Mayank Suryavanshi, in his house, a white bag containing a total of 6 boxes was seized. Each box contained 5 strips, and each strip had 20 tablets of Nitrosun10. Additionally, five strips of tablets were kept outside the bag, totaling 700 tablets. Based on the memorandum statement given by Mayank Suryavanshi, the present applicant has been made a co-accused in the matter. 3. It has been argued by learned counsel for the applicant that the present applicant has been falsely implicated in this case and said contraband article was not seized from the possession of the present applicant. He further submits that prosecution agency has not followed the provisions under Section 42 of the NDPS Act and not taken search warrant from the superior authority. He also submits that the present applicant has 09 criminal antecedents under the Arms Act and under the IPC in which only 03 cases are still pending, in rest of the cases the applicant has already been acquitted. He further submits that the co-accused person, namely, Mayank Suryavanshi alias Sunny in MCRC No. 2042 of 2025 has already been granted bail by this Hon’ble Court vide order dated 12.03.2025, hence the applicant is also entitled to be released on bail on the ground of parity. 4. On the other hand, learned State counsel would oppose the bail application and submit that the charge-sheet has been filed in the present case before the competent Court. He also submits that looking to the criminal antecedents of the applicant, his bail application is liable to be dismissed. 5. I have heard learned counsel appearing for the parties and perused 3 the case diary. 6. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case that though the present applicant has 09 criminal antecedents under the Arms Act and under the IPC, only 03 cases are still pending, in rest of the cases the applicant has already been acquitted, moreover, the fact that the co-accused person, namely, Mayank Suryavanshi alias Sunny in MCRC No. 2042 of 2025 has already been granted bail by this Court vide order dated 12.03.2025, therefore, this Court is of the considered view that the present applicant is also entitled to be grant regular bail on the ground of parity in this Case. 7. Let the Applicant – Durgesh Suryavanshi, involved in Crime No. 1583/2024 registered at Police Station Sarkanda, District Bilaspur (C.G.) for the offence punishable under Sections 21 and 22 r/w Section 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, be released on bail on his furnishing personal bond with two sureties in the like sum to the satisfaction of the Court concerned with the following conditions:- (i) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the trial court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law. (ii) The applicant shall remain present before the trial court on each date fixed, either personally or through 4 his counsel. In case of his absence, without sufficient cause, the trial court may proceed against him under Section 269 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. (iii) In case, the applicant misuses the liberty of bail during trial and in order to secure his presence, proclamation under Section 84 of BNSS. is issued and the applicant fails to appear before the Court on the date fixed in such proclamation, then, the trial court shall initiate proceedings against him, in accordance with law, under Section 209 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. (iv) The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the trial court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section 351 of BNSS. If in the opinion of the trial court absence of the applicant is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the trial court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of bail and proceed against him in accordance with law. 8. Office is directed to send a certified copy of this order to the trial Court concerned for necessary information and compliance forthwith./- Sd/- (Ramesh Sinha) Chief Justice Sd/- Abhishek