[2025:JHHC:17956] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr.M.P. No.2318 of 2023 ------ 1. Prakash Seth, aged about 24 years, Son of Sunil Kumar, 2. Sunil Kumar, aged about 59 years, Son of Late Arjun Raman 3. Kavita Kumari, aged about 54 years, Wife of Sunil Kumar 4. Vicky Seth @ Vikky Seth, aged about 32 years, Son of Sunil Kumar 5. Akash Seth, aged about 30 years, Son of Sunil Kumar 6. Sujit Seth, aged about 54 years, Son of Late Arjun Raman 7. Sudhanshu Seth @ Sudhanshu Kr. Aged about 23 years, Son of Sujit Seth All are resident of Holding No.83, Sonapati Gali, Jhumritelaiya, P.O. & P.S.- Telaiya, Dist.- Koderma … Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Soni Kumari, Wife of Prakash Seth, Resident of Holding No.83, Sonapati Gali, Jhumritelaiya, P.O. and P.S.- Telaiya, Dist.- Koderma, presently residing at Gandhi School Road, Jhumritelaiya, P.O. & P.S- Telaiya, Dist.- Koderma … Opposite Parties ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioners : Mr. Nitesh Kumar, Advocate For the State : Ms. Anuradha Sahay, Addl.P.P. ------ Order No:-06 Dated:-04-07-2025 Heard the parties. This criminal miscellaneous petition has been filed by the petitioners with a prayer for modification of the order dated 12.02.2020 passed in A.B.A. No.7904 of 2019. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that vide order dated 12.02.2020 passed in A.B.A. No.7904 of 2019, the petitioners were given the privileges of anticipatory bail and directed to surrender before the court below within four months upon their undertaking to jointly deposit a demand draft of Rs.50,000/- drawn in favour of the informant. It is next submitted that due to paucity of money, the petitioners could not make the said demand draft within the stipulated time, hence, they could not surrender within the stipulated time. It is next submitted that in the meantime the petitioners have arranged the money and prepared the said demand draft and the copy of the same has been annexed with the brief. It is further submitted that now the petitioners are ready and willing to surrender before the learned court below and unless six weeks’ extension is granted to them, they will be highly prejudiced. Hence, it is submitted that the time period for the petitioners to surrender before the court below in terms of the order dated 12.02.2020 passed in A.B.A. No.7904 of 2019 be extended by six weeks from the date of this order. Considering the aforesaid submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners, the prayer for extension of time for the petitioners to surrender in in the court below in terms of the order dated 12.02.2020 passed in A.B.A. No.7904 of 2019 is allowed. Accordingly, the order dated 12.02.2020 passed in A.B.A. No.7904 of 2019 is modified by directing the petitioners to surrender within six weeks from the date of this order, in terms of the order dated 12.02.2020 passed in A.B.A. No.7904 of 2019. The order dated 12.02.2020 passed in A.B.A. No.7904 of 2019 is modified to the aforesaid extent only. This criminal miscellaneous petition is disposed of accordingly. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Animesh/