1 2025:CGHC:12168 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 1907 of 2019 • Gajendra Kumar Patel S/o Shri Balki Patel Aged About 43 Years Panch, Village Karigathi, Gram Panchayat Marodarha, Tahsil Baramakela, District Raigarh Chhattisgarh., District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Panchayat And Rural Development Department, Mantralaya,mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2. Additional Commissioner Bilaspur, Division District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 3. Collector District Raigarh, District Raigarh Chhattisgarh., District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh 4. Sub Divisional Officer And Presiding Officer (Panchayat) Sarangarh, District Raigarh Chhattisgarh., District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh 5. Chief Executive Officer District Panchayat Raigarh, District Raigarh Chhattisgarh., District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh 6. Chief Executive Officer Janpad Panchayat Baramakela, District Raigarh Chhattisgarh., District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh 7. Priyanka Gupta, Technical Assistant, Janpad Panchayat Baramkela, District Raigarh Chhattisgarh., District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh 8. Laxmi Prasad Patel S/o Ram Kumar Patel R/o Marodarha, Tahsil Baramkela, District Raigarh Chhattisgarh., District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) (Cause Title is taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Mr. Shikhar Sharma, Advocate holding the brief of Mr. Raghvendra Pradhan, Advocate For State : Mr. Pramod Ramteke, Panel Lawyer SIDDHANT TAMRAKAR Digitally signed by SIDDHANT TAMRAKAR Date: 2025.03.12 18:22:38 +0530 2 For Respondent No. 7 : Mr. Ram Narayan Sahu, Advocate For Respondent No. 8 : Mr. Bharat Lal Sahu, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 11. 03.2025 1. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that by efflux of time, this petition has become infructuous. 2. No objection from the other side. 3. Taking into consideration the statement made by Mr. Sharma, the instant petition is dismissed being rendered infructuous. However, the petitioner would be at liberty to revive its prayer if cause of action still subsists. 4. Interim order granted earlier is hereby vacated. Sd Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge $iddhant