Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 21177 (MAD)

Aashik S and Lidhwan v. State represented by the Inspector of Police,

CRL OP/3204/2025 · 2025-02-13

Sunder Mohan

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRL OP NO. 3204 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 13-02-2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN CRL OP NO. 3204 of 2025 1.Aashik S 2.Lidhwan V Petitioners Vs State represented by the Inspector of Police, J-12, Kanathur Police Station Crime not known Respondent Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 to enlarge the petitioner / Accused on bail in the event of arrest in Crime No.not known pending on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioner(s): Mr.P V Ravi Chandran For Respondent(s): Mr.S.Balaji, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) ORDER The petitioners, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 112,125,126(1), 129, 130 and 281 of BNS, in Crime No.not known, on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail. 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP NO. 3204 of 2025 2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioners along with his friends parked their vehicle near Muttukadu boat house. While so another car came in a rash manner and when the petitioners shouted at them, chaos arose creating ruckus. Hence, the case. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioners are innocent; that they have been falsely implicated in this case and they are college students and are ready to abide by any condition putforth by this Court and hence, prayed for grant of anticipatory bail. 4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent police re-iterated the prosecution case and on instructions submitted that FIR has been registered and hence, this petition is liable to be dismissed. 5. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) for the respondent and also perused the materials available on record. 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP NO. 3204 of 2025 6. Considering the submissions made on either side, it is clear that FIR has been registered and hence, the petition is dismissed with a liberty to the petitioners to file a fresh anticipatory bail mentioning the crime number. 7.Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. 13-02-2025 vca To 1.Inspector of Police, J-12, Kanathur Police Station 2.The Public Prosecutor High Court, Madars 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP NO. 3204 of 2025 SUNDER MOHAN, J. vca CRL OP NO. 3204 of 2025 13.02.2025 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis