Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
i ---,---i-i--` IN THE HIGH COURT-OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAV FRIDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSANDAND TWENTY FIVEZ l'+'` :PRESENT:
NOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SREENIVASA REDDY E= THf4o I '\cvRTIlril`N-All-PT=`+I-TTo-i-I; :-;1-i i-;i--i;2; Z ~'IT:She +a.Kser ":`pe Betwee n :
1. EIike Vijay Kumar, S/o Subbarao, Aged about 50 years, R/o D.No. 3-10, Nehru Pete, Nuzvid, Eluru District.
2. El|lke Sridevi, W/o Vijay Kumar, Aged about 45 years, R/o D.No. 3-10, Nehru Peta, Nuzvid, EIuru D-lstrict gr/ ...petitioner/Accused Nos.2 and 3 AND The State of Andhra Pradesh, Through Station House Officer, Nuzvid Town police station, EIuru District, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor High Court of Andhra Pradesh, at Amaravati. . I [Respondent/Complainant petition under section 482 of BNSS is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the memorandum of grounds filed in support of the criminal petition, the High Court may be pleased tO enlarge the petitioners/Accused Nos.2 and 3 on Anticipatory Bail, in the event Of their arrest in connection with FIR No.125 of 2025 dated 17.06.2025 on the file of Nuzvid Town Pol'lce Station, EIuru District, re,gnl2S;e r# der Sections 69, 318(4) r/w 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. ? The petition coming on for hearing, upon Perusing the Petition and the memorandum of grounds filed in support thereof and upon hearing the
arguments of SRI V R MAHESWARA RAO PALETI Advocate for the petitioner, and of PUBLIC PROSECUTOR for the Respondent, and the Court made the following
ORDER:
++ +, APHCO10299512025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATl (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3327] FRIDAY ,THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SREENIVASA REDDY CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 6112/2025 Between : Elike Vijay Kumar and Others ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED(S) AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT Counsel for the Petitioner/accused(s):
1.V R MAHESWARA RAO PALETI Counsel for the Respondent/complainant.- 1.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following:
ORDER: ~ The Criminal Petition, under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, is filed on behalf of the petitioners/A2 and A3 to grant anticipatory bail in connectI-On With Crime No.125/2025 of Nuzvid Town Police Station, Eluru District. -`t } sq-I? \_ \
2. A case has been registered against tile petitioners and another for the offences punishable under sect]'ons 69, 318(4) read w]'th 3(5) of the B.N-S.
3. Case of the prosecutI'On in brief, is that the defacto complainant was jn love with A1, who I'S the son of petit[|oners/A2 and A3. AI promI'Sed the defacto complainant to marry her but subsequently avoided her due to the refusal of his parents who threatened Al that they would commit suicide I®f Al marries the defacto complaI'nant. Bas['ng on the report, police regI'S{ered the crime, I|nVeSt]-gated the matter, arrested AI Qn 17.6.2025 and sent him to remand. 4. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Assistant Public Prosecutor for respondent-state. perused the record. 5. Learned Assistant public Prosecutor submits that investI|gatiOn iS goI-ng On and some more witnesses are {o be examined. 6. Aperusal of the material available on record goes to showthat, a" the a`llegations are attributed agaI'nSt A1. The only allegatl'on that has been made against the petjtI-Oners herein is that they threatened Al that they would commit sujcjde if Al marries the defacto comp]ainant. Except that, there is nothing incrimI'nating against the petitioners. In view of the facts and cI-rCumSfanCeS Of the case, this Court l's inclined to consider the prayer of the petitl'oners for grant of antI-CiPatOry bail. c--
``-_"`*_-`-_- _"I -__,_= ± *ng _`__. --i;'**.*~€ =-'`.``
7. Accordingly, in the event of their arrest with regard to this crime, petitioners/A2 and A3 shall be released on bail on their executing a personal bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees ten thousand only) each with two sureties for the like sum each to the satisfaction of the arresting police officials and also on condition that the petitioners shall make themselves available for investigation as and when required and that they shall not cause.any threat, inducement or promise to the prosecution witnesses. The petitioners shall appear before the Station House Officer concerned, once in a week i.e. on every Sunday between 10.00 am and 05,00 pm, till filing of the charge-sheet|
8. Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is allowed. //TRUE COPY// sADs/s: K#oGF :AscCTEHRRAARR! To]
1.
The Station House Officer, Nuzvid Town Police Station, EIuru District. 2. One CC to SRl. V R MAHESWARA RAO PALETI, Advocate [OPUC]
3. Two CCs to PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT]
4. One spare copy KN
I- HIGH COURT SRK,J DATED : 27/06/2025
ORDER CRLP.No.6112 of2025 ALLOWED