Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 21176 (RAJ)

DR. SITA RAM SHARMA S/O SHRI KAILASH CHANDRA SHARMA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CCP/532/2024 · 2025-09-04

Avneesh Jhingan, Baljinder Singh Sandhu

Contempt Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:35514-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 532/2024 1. Dr. Sita Ram Sharma S/o Shri Kailash Chandra Sharma, Aged About 60 Years, Resident 20-A Keshav Nagar Keshav Vidyapeeth Circle Jamdoly Jaipur Rajasthan. 2. Dr. Pramod Kumar Atmagyani S/o Shri Ramsahai, Aged About 60 Years, Resident Of C-12, Tirupati Nagar, Near Magistrate Quarter, Hindaun, Karauli, Rajasthan. ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Department Of Ayurveda And Bhartiuya Chikitsa, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Smt. Punam, Principal Secretary, Department Of Ayurveda And Bhartiya Chikitsa, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur. 3. Shri Sawan Kumar Chayal Dy. Secretary, Department Of Ayurveda And Bhartiya Chikitsa Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur. 4. Shri Hemant Kumar Gera, Principal Secretary, Department Of Personnel, Government Secretariat, Jaipur. 5. Dr. Anand Kumar Sharma, Director Ayurveda, Directorate Of Ayurveda, Ajmer. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Jaivardhan Singh Shekhawat For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rajendra Prasad, Advocate General assisted by Mr. Sheetanshu Sharma & Mr. Tanay Goyal Mr. Bhuwnesh Sharma, AAG with Mr. Vishnu Dutt Sharma, Ms. Sunita Meena, Mr. Aakash Mewara, Ms. Epsa Nangalia, Mr. Kartikeya Shukla & Ms. Kavita Sharma Ms. Mahi Yadav, AAG with Mr. Kuldeep Singh Rathore & Mr. Aaditya Godara [2025:RJ-JP:35514-DB] (2 of 2) [CCP-532/2024] HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BALJINDER SINGH SANDHU Order 04/09/2025 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that so far as the petitioner No.1-Dr. Sita Ram Sharma is concerned, the case is covered by the decision passed on 04.09.2025 in DB Civil Contempt Petition No.330/2024 (Dr. Ramavtar Sharma) and other connected matters. 2. In view of this submissions, this contempt petition qua petitioner No.1 is disposed of in terms of the order passed in case of Dr. Ramavtar Sharma (supra). 3. The next contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the case of the petitioner No.2-Dr. Pramod Kumar Atmagyani deserves to be disposed of in terms of the order passed in D.B. Civil Contempt Petition No.11/2025 and other connected matters. Submission is that since the petitioner voluntarily had not joined the service, this Court in identical cases has dismissed the contempt petition. 4. The contempt petition qua petitioner No.2 is also disposed of in terms of the order dated 04.09.2025 passed in D.B. Civil Contempt Petition No.11/2025. (BALJINDER SINGH SANDHU),J (AVNEESH JHINGAN),J Sunita /46