Sl.No. 48 Court No. 35 G.S.Das 07.05.2025 WPA 9402 of 2025 Tahidula @ Tahidul Sekh -Vs- The State of West Bengal & Ors. Mr. Amit Ranjan Pati … for the Petitioner(s) Ms. Jhuma Chakraborty, ld. Sr. Adv. Ms. Munmun Tewary … for the State-respondent(s) Mr. Amit Kr. Ghosh … for the respondent no.6 The report furnished by the petitioner to the Inspector-in-charge of Bagnan Police Station do not reflect any cause of action has arisen against the inaction of the police authorities. Learned advocate for the petitioner submits that he is facing inconveniences. The report submitted by the State reflects that a civil suit being T.S. 51 of 2024 is pending, although the ad interim injunction order was vacated. However, if the petitioner faces any inconveniences, he would, if so advised, take out an appropriate application before the learned jurisdictional civil court which would address the inconveniences faced by him. With the aforesaid observations, WPA 9402 of 2025 is disposed of. Pending application(s), if any, is also disposed of. Report so submitted be kept with the record. Parties to act on a server copy of this order duly collected from the official website of the Hon’ble High Court, Calcutta. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)