Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 2117 (ALL)

RAVI KARAN v. STATE OF U.P.

BAIL/41573/2025 · 2026-04-19

Krishan Pahal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 41573 of 2025 Court No. - 65 (Sr. No.180 out of 277) HON'BLE KRISHAN PAHAL, J. 1. List has been revised. 2. Heard Sri Lalit Kumar Misra, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Arun Kumar Mishra, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material placed on record. 3. Applicant seeks bail in Case Crime No.74 of 2025, under Sections 64(2)F, 115(2), 351(2), 352 BNS, Police Station Paschim Sarira, District Kaushambi, during the pendency of trial. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant has argued that the applicant is absolutely innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. The applicant is brother-in-law of the victim and has been falsely implicated in the case. It is a clear cut case of false implication and misuse of dowry laws as the husband and wife duo are estranged and a divorce petition is pending between them. The applicant has no criminal history and is in jail since 15.9.2025. He undertakes to cooperate with the trial and not misuse the liberty of bail. 5. Learned A.G.A. has vehemently opposed the bail application but the submissions raised by the learned counsel for the applicant could not be disputed. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, the evidence on record, taking into Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Lalit Kumar Misra Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Ravi Karan .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) consideration the fact that applicant is the brother-in-law of the victim and family dispute is going on between the husband and wife duo, and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, prima-facie the Court is of the view that the applicant has made out a case for bail. The bail application is allowed. 7. Let the applicant- Ravi Karan, be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties to the satisfaction of the court concerned, subject to verification of sureties, with the conditions that he shall not tamper with evidence or intimidate witnesses and shall appear before the trial court as required. 8. Breach of any condition shall entail cancellation of bail. The observations herein shall not affect the trial on merits. April 20, 2026 Vikas Verma BAIL No. 41573 of 2025 2 (Krishan Pahal,J.) Digitally signed by :- VIKAS VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad