Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 21165 (RAJ)

PRAHLAD KUMAR MEENA S/O SH. RAM SAHAY MEENA v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/9631/2024 · 2025-04-25

Mahendar Kumar Goyal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:17511] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 9631/2024 1. Prahlad Kumar Meena S/o Sh. Ram Sahay Meena, Aged About 57 Years, R/o Mukam Post - Toda, Tehsil - Bamanvas, District -Sawai Madhopur 2. Bhagwati Meena W/o Sh. Ram Singh, Aged About 49 Years, R/o 174, Radha Swami Colony, Bhagwan Ganj Ajmer (Raj) 3. Gyan Chand S/o Sh. Ram Singh, Aged About 49 Years, R/o 174, Radha Swami Colony, Bhagwan Ganj Ajmer (Raj) 4. Ram Chandra Raigar S/o Sh. Ladu Ram Raigar, Aged About 55 Years, R/o Sanskrit School Ka Rasta And Shitla Mata Jaliya -2 Ajmer (Raj) 5. Brahma Meena C/o Sh. Harji Ram Meena, Aged About 42 Years, R/o Laxman Kutir 14/88, Cisf Link Marg Devli Tonk (Raj) 6. Mahendra Kumar S/o Sh. Omkar, Aged About 48 Years, R/o Behind Secondary School, Mangliyawas, Peesangan Ajmer (Raj) 7. Rishi Raj Meena S/o Sh. Sugreev Meena, Aged About 42 Years, R/o Badathok, Bamanwas Sawai Madhopur (Raj) 8. Kanta Mandavaria W/o Sh. Ghanshyam Chandolia, Aged About 49 Years, R/o 10 A, Vakil Colony, Jawahar Ki Nadi, Chandra Bardai Nagar Ajmer (Raj) 9. Hemlata Guru D/o Sh. Bansi Lal Guru, Aged About 47 Years, R/o Agra Gate Ke Bahar Ajmer (Raj) 10. Smt. Manju W/o Sh. Moti Lal Garg, Aged About 59 Years, R/o Shri Navratan Pareek Ke Samne Alakhnanda Colony, Ratidang Ajmer (Raj) 11. Hari Singh Meena S/o Sh. Ramdhan Meena, Aged About 49 Years, R/o 28, Goth Amrawara, Sawai Madhopur (Raj) 12. Sangeeta Meena C/o Sh. Surendra Kumar Meena, Aged About 47 Years, R/o - I 386 Ajad Nagar, Ward No. 14 Bhilwara (Raj.) 13. Kailash Chandra Bhambhi S/o Sh. Harbu Bhambhi, Aged About 50 Years, R/o Meghwanshi Mohalla, Jharwasa Ajmer (Raj) [2025:RJ-JP:17511] (2 of 3) [CW-9631/2024] 14. Kailash Chand Sharma S/o Sh. Mohan Lal Sharma, Aged About 56 Years, R/o Bada Mohalla, Jalia Ii, Ajmer (Raj) 15. Ram Kumar Dhobi S/o Sh. Debi Lal Dhobi, Aged About 52 Years, R/o 533/4, Arihan Marbel Ke Pas Ajad Nagar, Ward No. 11 Bhilwara (Raj) 16. Smt. Ranjita Kanojia W/o Sh. Manish Verma, Aged About 46 Years, R/o Balwanta Chauraha, Danta Ajmer (Raj) 17. Kailash Chandra Nagla S/o Sh. Badri Lal Nagla, Aged About 57 Years, R/o Village-Jaliya-2, Tehsil-Masuda Ajmer (Raj) 18. Ram Ratan Meen S/o Sh. Ram Kishan Meena, Aged About 56 Years, R/o Amali Ajmer 19. Madan Singh Chauhan S/o Sh. Bhagwan Singh, Aged About 56 Years, R/o Ward No. 1, Lotiyana, Ajmer (Raj). 20. Madan Lal Katik S/o Sh. Laxman Lal, Aged About 52 Years, R/o 2220, Balai Khera, Mandal Bhilwara (Raj) 21. Smt. Anita Pratihar W/o Sh. Ramesh Chandra Meena, Aged About 50 Years, R/o 43, Indra Colony Uncha, Bhilwara (Raj) 22. Girdharilal Naval S/o Sh. Banna Ram Naval, Aged About 52 Years, R/o Behind Kamal Int Udhyog, Gomati Nagar, Sd Govt. College Link Road Beawar Ajmer (Raj) 23. Shiv Kumar Tailor S/o Madan Lal Tailor, Aged About 53 Years, R/o Kachola, Sadar Bajar, Bhilwra (Raj) ----Petitioners Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Education Deptt., Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur 2. The Director, Secondary Education, Bikaner 3. The Deputy Director, Ajmer Division, Secondary Education Ajmer 4. The Deputy Director, Ajmer Division, Elementary Education Ajmer 5. Principal Chief District Education Officer, Secondary Education, Ajmer ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vinod Goyal [2025:RJ-JP:17511] (3 of 3) [CW-9631/2024] For Respondent(s) : Ms. Namita Parihar, DGC HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL Judgment / Order 25/04/2025 Learned counsels for the respective parties submit that the controversy involved herein is no more res integra and stands resolved by a coordinate Bench order of this Court dated 02.05.2024 passed in the case of Omprakash Barsiwal versus The State of Rajasthan & Ors.: SB Civil Writ Petition No.21266/2018. They, therefore, pray that this writ petition may also be disposed of in similar terms. Ordered accordingly. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. (MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL),J Manish/s-213