APHC010299202025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] MONDAY,THE THIRTIETH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 15699/2025 Between: 1. LAKKAKULA MALLESWARI, W/O. ANJANEYULU, AGE ABOUT 50 YEARS, OCC COOLIE AT HOTEL R/O. D.NO. 12- 70, JANAPADU ROAD, PIDUGURALLA TOWN AND MANDAL, PALNADU DISTRICT-522413 2. LAKKAKULA ANAND BABU,, S/O. ANJANEYULU AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS, OCC CAR DRIVER, R/O. D.NO. 12-70, JANAPADU ROAD, PIDUGURALLA TOWN AND MANDAL, PALNADU DISTRICT-522413 ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP.BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, AT VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, PALNADU DISTRICT, NARASARAOPET. 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, GURAZALA, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 4. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PIDUGURALLA POLICE STATION, PALANADU DISTRICT. 2 5. GONDIA SRINIVASA RAO PANDURANGA SRINU, S/O AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS, OFFICE AT PANDURANGA ELECTRONICS, HAND CENTRE, PIDUGURALLA TOWN AND MANDAL, PALNADU DISTRICT. 6. R MALLIKHARJUNA RAO, S/O. MANNEIAH, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS, R/O. BESIDE HIGH SCHOOL, RAILWAY STATION ROAD, MACHERLA TOWN AND MANDAL, PALNADU DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus under Article 226 of Constitution of India to declaring the action of the 4th respondent calling the petitioners to Police Station and threatening to settle Civil disputes with the 5th and 6threspondents illegal, arbitrary and without jurisdiction and violative of Articles 21, 19(1)(g) of the Constitution of India and consequently to directing the 4th respondent not to call the petitioners into the police station and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to Direct the 4th respondent not to call the petitioners into the Pidigiralla police station, pending disposal of main writ petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. KALE VIJAYA RAJU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 3 The Court made the following order: The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the respondent No.4 is interfering in a civil dispute between the petitioner and respondent Nos.5 & 6. 2. The learned Assistant Government Pleader submits that respondent No.3 is not interfering in the civil dispute between the petitioner and respondent Nos.5 & 6. 3. Considering the same, this Court is inclined to dispose of the Writ Petition at the admission stage by directing respondent No.4 not to interfere in the civil dispute between the petitioner and respondent Nos.5 & 6 without following the due process of law. 4. With the above observation, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date: 30.06.2025 ANS 4 236 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 15699/2025 Date: 30.06.2025 ANS