[2025:RJ-JP:23359] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 7296/2025 Kamlesh S/o Harji, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Piplai, Police Station Bamanwas, District Sawai Madhopur ( Raj.) ( At Present Confined In Sub Jail Gangapur City) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mukesh Pal Jadoun with Mr. Anurag Chahar For Respondent(s) For Complainant(s) : : Mr. Vivek Sharma, Addl.GA. With Mr. Onkar Singh Rajpurohit, PP. Mr. Krishan Kant Panwar on behalf of Mr. Ravindra Kumar Paliwal HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANEESH SHARMA (V. J.) Order 19/06/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.225/2024 registered at Police Station Bamanwas, District Gangapur City, for the offence punishable under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submits that the petitioner is in judicial custody since 21.05.2025 and the offences levelled against the petitioner are triable by Magistrate. He further submits that the present allegations are borne out of the filing of a false trace map in a civil suit which is pending and [2025:RJ-JP:23359] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-7296/2025] the trial of the case will take considerable time, and further custody of the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose, therefore, he may be enlarged on bail. 3. Per contra, learned Additional Government Advocate as well as Public Prosecutor and learned counsel for the complainant have opposed the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner. 4. Heard and considered the contentions made by the learned counsel for the parties and perused the material available on record. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by the learned counsel for the petitioner, and also the fact that the petitioner is in judicial custody since 21.05.2025, the offences levelled against the petitioner are triable by Magistrate, and the trial of the case will take considerable time, hence, without commenting any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it fit and proper to allow this bail application. 6. The bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that the accused-petitioner Kamlesh S/o Harji shall be released on bail provided that he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so. [2025:RJ-JP:23359] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-7296/2025] 7. It is made clear that the petitioner shall not involve in other offence(s) of similar nature during currency of this bail. 8. The petitioner shall not tamper with any evidence, nor would influence the witnesses in the case. (MANEESH SHARMA (V. J.)),J Seema/33