M/S SHREE RADHE TRADERS THRO ITS PROPRIETOR GAGAN FOGLA v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
Cont.(Cvl)/1003/2025 · 2025-08-25
Rajesh Shankar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 21158 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 21158 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:JHHC:25075-DB
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Cont. Case (Civil) No. 1003 of 2025 M/s. Shree Radhe Traders, having its office at Khata No.430, Plot No.981, Gumla, P.O. & P.S.-Gumla, District-Gumla, through its proprietor Gagan Fogla, aged about 24 years, son of Mahesh Agarwal, resident of Pandit Mohalla, Near S.S. High School, P.O. & P.S.-Gumla, District-Gumla. ... Petitioner
Versus
1. The State of Jharkhand
2. Prashant Kumar, son of not known to the petitioner, Secretary, Department of Finance, Government of Jharkhand, Project Building, HEC, Dhurwa, P.O. & P.S.-Dhurwa, District-Ranchi;
3. Prerna Dixit, daughter/wife of not known to the petitioner, Deputy Commissioner, Gumla, P.O. & P.S.-Gumla, District-Gumla.
... Opposite Parties
---------
CORAM:
HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR
--------- For the Petitioner: Mr. Pandey Neeraj Rai, Advocate For the Opp. Parties: Mr. Jayant Franklin Toppo, G.A.-V
Mr. Neil Abhijit Toppo, A.C. to G.A.-V
--------- 03/Dated: 25.08.2025 Tarlok Singh Chauhan, C.J.(Oral)
1.
Learned counsel for the State, in presence of learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the admitted amount as per the State has been paid to the petitioner.
2. In this view of the matter, no fruitful purpose would be served in continuing with the contempt. The same is accordingly dismissed. However, liberty is reserved with the petitioner to avail of such remedy as available to it under the law regarding any subsisting or further claim.
(Tarlok Singh Chauhan, C.J.)
(Rajesh Shankar, J.) N.A.F.R. Manoj/Pramanik/Cp.2