- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:1516 WP No. 8563 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 8563 OF 2021 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: M/S.SUPRA FASHIONS BY PARTNER SRI M.N.VISHNU, AGE ABOUT 31 YEARS, S/O K.D.NAGARAJ SHETTY, NO 2220, 12TH MAIN, 'A' BLOCK, 2ND STAGE, RAJAJINAGAR. BENGALURU-560 010. …PETITIONER (BY SMT. SANDHYA.U.PRABHU., ADVOCATE [ABSENT]) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU-560 001. 2. BANK OF BARODA, (PREVIOUSLY VIJAYA BANK), REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORIZED OFFICER, HANUMANTHANAGAR BRANCH-1076 , NO.25, ALOKA, 3RD MAIN ROAD, HANUMANTHANAGAR, BENGALURU-560 019. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MANJUNATHA RAYAPPA., AGA FOR R1; R2-SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. Digitally signed by THEJASKUMAR N Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:1516 WP No. 8563 of 2021 THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER When the case is called, the petitioner is not represented. When the case is listed and called out, the advocate must be present. The absence may affect the case. Sri.Manjunatha Rayappa., AGA for respondent No.1 has appeared in person. As could be seen from the writ papers, the petition is filed in the year 2021 i.e., on 27.04.2021 and the office has raised certain objection on 27.04.2021. Now we are in the month of January 2025. It's been four years. So far, the office objections are not complied with. As already noted above, when the case is called, the petitioner is not represented. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution and also for non-compliance of office objections. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE TKN List No.: 3 Sl No.: 21