PURABI GOGOI AND ORS. v. ICICI LOMBARD GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED AND ANR
I.A.(Civil)/3822/2024 · 2025-04-01
Robin Phukan
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 21153 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 21153 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010251182024
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/3822/2024 PURABI GOGOI AND ORS.
W/O LATE DILIP GOGOI, R/O VILLAGE NO. 2, BHARALICHAK, WARD NO. 5, P.S.- DHEMAJI, DIST.- DHEMAJI, ASSAM, PIN- 787057.
2: MINTU GOGOI S/O LATE DILIP GOGOI R/O VILLAGE NO. 2 BHARALICHAK WARD NO. 5 P.S.- DHEMAJI DIST.- DHEMAJI ASSAM PIN- 787057.
3: SHYAMANTA GOGOI S/O LATE DILIP GOGOI R/O VILLAGE NO. 2 BHARALICHAK WARD NO. 5 P.S.- DHEMAJI DIST.- DHEMAJI ASSAM PIN- 787057 VERSUS ICICI LOMBARD GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED AND ANR HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT SHRI SIDDHI VINAYAK GANAPATI MANDIR, ICICI LAMBARD HOUSE 414, P. BALU MARG, SVS ROAD, PRABHADEVI, MUMBAI- 400025, ITS ZONAL OFFICE AT 7TH FLOOR, APEEJAY HOUSE, 15, PARK STREET, KOLKATA- 700016 AND ITS BRANCH OFFICE AT 3RD FLOOR, KAMAKHYA TOWER, G.S. ROAD, CHRISTIAN BASTI, GUWAHATI- 781005, REP. BY THE LEGAL MANAGER.
Page No.# 2/3 2:BITUL BORGOHAIN S/O BHUBON BORGOHAIN VILL.- BARAJAN GOHAINPAM P.O.- SUBAHI P.S.- DHEMAJI ASSAM PIN- 787057 Advocate for the Petitioner : DR. U BARUAH, MR. K K DUTTA,MR. DEBANUJ DUTTA,MR.
A KAKATI Advocate for the Respondent : ,
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ROBIN PHUKAN
ORDER 02.04.2025
Heard Ms. S. Chutia, learned counsel for the applicants and Mr. T. Kalita,
learned counsel for the opposite party No. 1. This interlocutory application, is preferred by the applicants for releasing 20% of the awarded amount deposited in the registry of this court in favour of the applicants. Ms. Chutia, learned counsel for the applicants submits that pursuant to
order of this court, dated 31.05.2024, passed in I.A.(Civil) No. 1590/2024, the opposite party No. 1 has deposited a sum of Rs. 8,11,516/-, being the 20% of the awarded amount before the registry of this court and the said amount may be released in favour of the applicants. Mr. Kalita, learned counsel for the opposite party No. 1 submits that he has no objection in the event of releasing the aforesaid amount on furnishing a bond by the applicant. Taking note of the submissions of learned counsel for both the parties, it
Page No.# 3/3 is provided that the registry shall release the deposited amount, i.e. 8,11,516/- in favour of the applicants, on their executing a bond of equal amount. In terms of above, this interlocutory application stands closed.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant