Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 21149 (RAJ)

DR. RADHA KRISHNAN COLLEGE v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/9348/2025 · 2025-07-01

Anoop Kumar Dhand

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:24039] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 9348/2025 Dr. Radha Krishnan College, Basni, Tehsil Mundawar District Alwar Running By Apex Shiksha Samiti, Basni, Teshil Mundawar, District Alwar Through Its President Shri Nishkam S/o Shri Rajpal, Aged About 29, Resident Of Ward No. -08, Mandi By Pass, Bhudawali Ke Pass, Khairthal, District Alwar (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Department Of Animal Husbandry, State Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. The Director, Department Of Animal Husbandry, State Of Rajasthan, Gandhi Nagar Mod, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Om Prakash Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Aaditya Godara for Ms. Mahi Yadav-AAG JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 01/07/2025 1. Counsel for the petitioner submits that for running the Diploma Course of Live Stock Assistant, an application along with requisite fee was submitted by the petitioner on the last date i.e. 23.07.2024. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the banking system did not accept the transaction as successful, even though the amount was deducted from the petitioner’s account. Counsel submits that though the transaction reflected as failed but the amount i.e. Rs. 5,00,000/- is lying in the account of the respondents, hence there was no fault on the part of the petitioner and even then, the respondents have not granted the NOC to the [2025:RJ-JP:24039] (2 of 2) [CW-9348/2025] petitioner to run the aforesaid course. Counsel submits that an application in this regard was submitted before the respondents, incorporating the above facts but the respondents have not decided the said application by passing a reasoned and speaking order, therefore appropriate direction be issued to the respondents to decide the said application expeditiously strictly in accordance with law. 2. Considering the submissions made by counsel for the petitioner and looking to the limited prayer made in the petition, the present writ petition stands disposed of with direction to the respondents to decide the application submitted by the petitioner (pending, if any) expeditiously as early as possible not beyond the period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of the certified copy of this order, strictly in accordance with law by passing a reasoned and speaking order. 3. Before parting with this order, it is made clear that this Court has not passed any order or direction to the respondents to decide the application of the petitioner in a particular way, the respondents would be at liberty to decide the same strictly in accordance with law. 4. Stay application and all pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Ashu/45