Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 21145 (KAR)

SRI PRASAD JAYARAM v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

CRL.P/3787/2022 · 2025-06-02

J M Khazi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:18529 CRL.P No. 3787 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE J.M.KHAZI CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 3787 OF 2022 BETWEEN: 1. SRI. PRASAD JAYARAM, S/O JAYARAM, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, NO.510, RR MEADOWS, UTTARAHALLI MAIN ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 061. 2. SMT. BHARATHI B.V. W/O PRASAD JAYARAM AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, NO.510, RR MEADOWS, UTTARAHALLI MAIN ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 061. 3. SRI. SHASHANK S/O CHENNEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, NO.307, RR MEADOWS, UTTARAHALLI MAIN ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 061. 4. KUM. PRIYANKA D/O CHENNEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS, Digitally signed by REKHA R Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:18529 CRL.P No. 3787 of 2022 NO.103, RR MEADOWS, UTTARAHALLI MAIN ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 061. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. GOVINDRAYA KAMATH, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA, CHANNAMANAKERE ACHUKATTU P.S., BENGALURU, REPRESENTED BY SPECIAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT BUILDING, BENGALURU - 560 001. 2. SMT. RENUKA D.J. MAJOR IN AGE, FATHER NAME NOT KNOWN, NO. 464/1, 7TH MAIN ROAD, BSK 3RD PHASE, STAGE, BENGALURU - 560 085. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. VENKAT SATYANARAYAN A, HCGP FOR R1; SRI. HITESH GOWDA B.S, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. ABHISHEK K, ADVOCATE FOR R2) THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 482 OF CR.PC PRAYING TO QUASH THE FIR AGAINST THEM REGISTERED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT IN CR.NO.20/2022 OF CHANNAMANAKERE ACHUKATTU P.S., BENGALURU FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S 406, 420, 504, 506 OF IPC ON THE FILE OF THE 4TH A.C.M.M AT BENGALURU. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:18529 CRL.P No. 3787 of 2022 THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MS JUSTICE J.M.KHAZI ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo seeking permission to withdraw the petition on the ground that it become infructuous. 2. In the light of the same, the petition is dismissed as withdraw for having become infructuous. 3. In view of the disposal of petition, pending application/s, if any, stands disposed off, as no separate order is required. Sd/- (J.M.KHAZI) JUDGE KBM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 5 CT: BHK