IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-3184-2025 Date of decision: 20.03.2025 Sukhdev Singh ….Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others ….Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN PALLI HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA Present: None for the petitioner. Mr. Shivendra Swaroop, DAG, Haryana. ARUN PALLI, J. (Oral) On February 05, 2025, this Court had passed the following order:- “Having argued the matter at some length, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he be afforded a short accommodation to clarify the nature of the dispute pending before the Supreme Court, and to place certain relevant documents on record. As prayed, adjourned to 20.03.2025.” The case has been called out twice. However, neither the necessary documents, as indicated above, have been placed on record, nor anyone is present on behalf of the petitioner to pursue the matter. That being so, the Court is choice-less, but to dismiss the petition for non- prosecution. Dismissed for non-prosecution. (ARUN PALLI) JUDGE (SUDEEPTI SHARMA) JUDGE 20.03.2025 Ak Sharma Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No AMIT KUMAR 2025.03.21 19:44 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document