1 2025:CGHC:20867 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 3216 of 2025 1 - Mukesh Kumar Jagat S/o Shri Najru Lal Jagat Aged About 36 Years Head Clerk Cum Assistant Grade I At Office Of Deputy Director, Panchayat District Mahasamund Presently Attached In Office Of Director Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojna (Gramin) Vikas Bhawan, Sector -19, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 2 - Pramod Pandey S/o Late Shri Bhaiyalal Pandey Aged About 38 Years Head Clerk Cum Assistant Grade I At Office Of Deputy Director, Panchayat District Raipur Presently Attached In Office Of Director Panchayat Vikas Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 3 - Sanjay Verma S/o Late Shri Vijay Kumar Verma Aged About 57 Years Head Clerk Cum Assistant Grade I At Office Of Deputy Director, Panchayat District Durg Presently Attached In Office Of Director Panchayat Vikas Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner(s) SHOAIB ANWAR Digitally signed by SHOAIB ANWAR Date: 2025.05.08 23:22:24 +0530 2 versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Panchayat And Rural Development Department, Mantralaya Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Atal Nagar, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 2 - The Director Panchayat Chhattisgarh Directorate Naya Raipur, Atal Nagar, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent(s) (Cause title taken from CIS) For Petitioner(s) : Shri A.S. Rajput Advocate. For Respondent(s) : Shri Sabyasachi Choubey, Panel Lawyer. Hon'ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru , Judge Order on Board 07.05.2025 1. By the present writ petition, the petitioners who were working as Assistant Grade-I in the Department of Panchayat are seeking seniority on the post of Head Clerk Cum Assistant Grade-I with effect from 2021 when they completed five years of experience on the post of Assistant Grade- II for which the petitioners have submitted a representation to the Director Panchayat vide (Annexure P/7) dated 28.01.2025, but the same has not been decided till date. 2. On the other hand, learned counsel appearing for the State submit that if the petitioners representation is pending consideration, the 3 same would be considered and decided in accordance with law within a stipulated period. 3. I have heard both the parties and perused the document. 4. In view of the submission made by the counsel for the State, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the concerned authority/respondent no. 2 to decide the pending representation dated 28.01.2025 submitted by the petitioners in accordance with law, within a period of 100 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 5. With the aforesaid direction, the writ petition is disposed of. Sd/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) Judge Shoaib