IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 9749 of 2024 Date of Decision: 18.06.2025 _______________________________________________________ Vikas Sharma …….Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & others. … Respondents ______________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Anshuman Thakur, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Mr. Rajan Kahol and Mr. B.C.Verma, Additional Advocate Generals and Mr. Ravi Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General, for the respondent/State. _______________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, Judge(oral): Since it is not in dispute that petitioner has already completed two years five months at present place of posting, this Court sees no reason to interfere with the impugned transfer order. 2. In view of the above, the present petition fails and is accordingly dismissed alongwith pending applications, if any. (Sandeep Sharma), Judge June 18, 2025 (shankar) 1Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?