IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.13252 of 2025 Date of decision: 25.08.2025 Jeet Ram. ...Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. & Ors. ...Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Satyen Vaidya, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Mr. P.D. Nanda, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Vishwadeep Sharma, Additional Advocate General. Satyen Vaidya, Judge (Oral): Notice. Mr. Vishwadeep Sharma, Additional Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents. 2. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this petition can be disposed of by directing respondent No.3 to decide and take action on reference made by respondent No.4 on 16.08.2024 annexed as Annexure P-3 of the petition in a time-bound manner. 3. Prayer being innocuous is allowed. 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? -2- 4. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of with direction to respondent No.3 to decide the reference (Annexure P-3) within six weeks from today strictly in accordance with law. Pending miscellaneous application, if any, also stand disposed of. (Satyen Vaidya) 25th August, 2024 Judge (Pardeep)