Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 21135 (PNJ)

PRUTHI FURNISHING PVT LTD v. ASHOK KUMAR KALARA AND ANOTHER

INCOMP/3999/2024 · 2025-04-29

Harpreet Singh Brar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

140 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA PRUTHI FURNISHING PVT LTD ASHOK KUMAR KALARA AND ANOTHER CORAM: HON’BLE MR. Present: None HARPREET SINGH BRAR 1. The aforesaid Singla, Advocate. However, certain objections were raised by the Registry. 2. As per Rule 9, Chapter 1, Part A, Volume V, Punjab and High Court Rules and Orders, been raised by the Registry is to be taken back by the counsel/parties, who filed it, to re-file within a period of 40 days. However, the same was not taken back for re-filing after removal of objections. On failure to do the needful, the case is to be listed before the Court for orders. 3. Even after the publication of the note requesting the Advocate to collect his case for re not done. Consequently, the matter list today. 4. No one has appeared on behalf of the 5. In view of the aforementioned facts, no further o to be passed. The file be consigned to the record. April 29, 2025 manisha (i) (ii) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH PRUTHI FURNISHING PVT LTD V/S ASHOK KUMAR KALARA AND ANOTHER HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HARPREET SINGH BRAR None. **** HARPREET SINGH BRAR, J. (ORAL) The aforesaid appeal was filed on , Advocate. However, certain objections were raised by the Registry. As per Rule 9, Chapter 1, Part A, Volume V, Punjab and High Court Rules and Orders, the appeal/petition, on which, objections have been raised by the Registry is to be taken back by the counsel/parties, who file within a period of 40 days. However, the same was not taken ing after removal of objections. On failure to do the needful, the case is to be listed before the Court for orders. Even after the publication of the note requesting the Advocate to case for re-filing after rectification of objections, the needful was not done. Consequently, the matter has been listed before this Court in urgent No one has appeared on behalf of the In view of the aforementioned facts, no further o to be passed. The file be consigned to the record. (HARPREET SINGH BRAR Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH INCOMP-3999-2024 Date of decision: 29.04.2025 ...APPELLANT ASHOK KUMAR KALARA AND ANOTHER ...RESPONDENTS HARPREET SINGH BRAR was filed on 16.09.2020 by Mr. Mohan , Advocate. However, certain objections were raised by the Registry. As per Rule 9, Chapter 1, Part A, Volume V, Punjab and Haryana the appeal/petition, on which, objections have been raised by the Registry is to be taken back by the counsel/parties, who file within a period of 40 days. However, the same was not taken ing after removal of objections. On failure to do the needful, the Even after the publication of the note requesting the Advocate to filing after rectification of objections, the needful was listed before this Court in urgent No one has appeared on behalf of the appellant. In view of the aforementioned facts, no further order is required to be passed. The file be consigned to the record. HARPREET SINGH BRAR) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No MANISHA 2025.04.30 17:57 I attest to the accuracy and authenticiy of this order/judgment