SMT.M.G MEENAKSHI SINCE DEAD BY HER LRS SAMANVITHA v. SRI.M.G NAGARAJ
WP/10194/2025 · 2025-04-24
H T Narendra Prasad
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 21135 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 21135 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
NC: 2025:KHC:16769 WP No. 10194 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF APRIL, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO. 10194 OF 2025 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN:
1. SMT.M.G MEENAKSHI SINCE DEAD BY HER LR’S SAMANVITHA AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS D/O. M.G.MEENAKSHI W/O. PAWAN NANJUDAIAH R/O. K-946, BRIGADE COSMOPOLITAN WHITE FIELDS MAIN ROAD BENGALURU-560 066. 2. MITHILA AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS D/O. M.G.MEENAKSHI W/O. VINAY R/O. MAYA INDRAPRASTHA APARTMENT J.P.NAGAR, 6TH PHASE KANAKAPURA ROAD, BENGALURU-560 078. 3. SMT.M.G.INDRAKSHI AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS W/O. DR.R.SRIVATSA D/O. LATE SRI.M.L.GOPALASWAMY R/O. HOUSE NO.374, KARANJA 1ST E-CROSS, 5TH BLOCK, 3RD PHASE BANASHANKARI 3RD STAGE BENGALURU-560 085. 4. SRI.G.V.GOPAL KRISHNA AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS S/O. SRI.M.G.VARADARAJ R/O. DOOR NO.965, 3RD STAGE
Digitally signed by HEMALATHA A Location: HIGH COURTOF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
NC: 2025:KHC:16769 WP No. 10194 of 2025
'A' BLOCK, 5TH CROSS GATTIGALLI, MYSURU-23. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. PRABHUGOUDA TAMBIGI., ADVOCATE) AND:
1. SRI.M.G NAGARAJ AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS S/O. LATE SRI.M.L.GOPALASWAMY
2. SRI.M.G.LAXMINARAYAN AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS S/O. LATE SRI.M.L.GOPALASWAMY
3. SRI. M.G.VARADARAJU AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS S/O. LATE SRI.M.L.GOPALASWAMY
4. SMT. M.G.JAYALAXMI AGED ABOUT 84 YEARS, W/O. LATE SRI.M.L.GOPALASWAMY
5. SMT. ARUNARAJ AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS W/O. SRI.M.G.VARADARAJ R1 TO R5 ARE RESEDENTS AT DOOR NO.965, 3RD STAGE, 'A' BLOCK 5TH CROSS, GATTIGALLI, MYSURU-23
6. HONNA BOVI AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS S/O. RAMA BOVI
7. B.V.KRISHNAMURTHY AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS S/O. VENKATA BOVI . 8. NANJUNDA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS
S/O. NANJA BOVI
- 3 -
NC: 2025:KHC:16769 WP No. 10194 of 2025
9. SMT. MANJULA.N AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS W/O. SOMASHEKARA R6 TO R10 ARE R/O BAKTHARAHALLI BOVI COLONY SINDHIGERE POST, LAKYA HOBLI CHIKMAGALURU TALUK-577 146. 10. SANNA BOVI AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS S/O. LATE SATTAGA BOVI @ } SATHYA SANNA BOVI . 11. VENKATESH AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS S/O. LATE SATTAGA BOVI @ SATHYA SANNA BOVI R/O BASAVANAKODI ESHWARAHALLI POST, LAKYA BOBLI CHIKMAGALURU TALUK-577 168. 12. SMT. NAGAMMA AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS W/O. RANGA BOVI RR10 TO R12 ARE R/O BASAVANAKODI ESHWARAHALLI POST, LAKYA BOBLI CHIKMAGALURU TALUK-577 168. 13. SMT.M.B.LATHAMANI AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS W/O. H.L.RAJANIKANTH
14. SMT. M R PARVATHI AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS WO SRI MANJA BOVI. 15. SMT.JAYAMMA AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS W/O. SRI.MURTHY. 16.
MANJA BOVI AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS
- 4 -
NC: 2025:KHC:16769 WP No. 10194 of 2025
S/O. DASA BOVI
17. SANNA BOVI AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS S/O. SOLLAPURI BOVI
18. SMT. HANUMANTHAMMA AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS W/O. NARAYANA SHETTY ESHWARAHALLI POST. 19. NAGA BOVI S/O. THIMMA BOVI R 13 RO 18 ARE R/O MEDARAHALLI ESHWARAHALLI POST, LAKYA HOBLI CHIKMAGALURU TALUK-577 168. 20. SMT. RENUKAMMA AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS W/O. DASAPPA, R/O. HULIKERE VILLAGE SAKARAYAPATNA HOBLI, KADUR TALUK-577 168. 21. RAMESH BOVI AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS S/O. HONNA BOVI, R/O. BAKTHARAHALLI
BOVI COLONY, SINDIGERE POST
LAKYA HOBLI,CHIKAMAGALUR TALUK-577 146
22. SRI.KU. V.SHARADA
AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS
D/O. SRI.M.G.VARADARAJ
R/O. DOOR NO.965, 3RD STAGE
'A' BLOCK, 5TH CROSS
GATTIGALLI, MYSURU-23. …RESPONDENTS
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE HONBLE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, CHIKMAGALUR TO
- 5 -
NC: 2025:KHC:16769 WP No. 10194 of 2025
DISPOSE OF THE FDP.NO.24/2017 AS EXPEDITIOUSLY AS POSSIBLE/ FORTHWITH, PRODUCED VIDE ANNEXURE-CSN
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR RELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD ORAL ORDER
1. This writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is filed by the petitioners, seeking a direction from this Court to the II Additional Senior Civil Judge, Chikkamagaluru to dispose of the final decree proceedings in FDP No.24/2012 pending before it.
2. Since the petitioner is only seeking a direction to dispose of FDP No.24/2012, service of notice to the respondents is not necessary and the same is dispensed with.
3. The plaintiffs have filed a suit for partition and separate possession. The suit was decreed by judgment and decree dated 28.06.2017. Thereafter, the plaintiffs have filed final decree proceedings in FDP No.24/2012. However, till date, no order has been passed in FDP
- 6 -
NC: 2025:KHC:16769 WP No. 10194 of 2025
No.24/2012. Being aggrieved by the same, the present petition has been filed.
4.
Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that, except respondent Nos.3 to 5, all other parties have no objection to the Commissioner report. On 31.07.2024, the trial Court granted time to respondent Nos.3 to 5 to file their objections to the Commissioner report. For one or the other reason, the matter has been adjourned and no
order has been passed. Hence, the petitioners have approached this Court seeking early disposal of the final decree proceeding.
5. In view of the above, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed of.
6. The II Additional Senior Civil Judge, Chikkamagaluru is directed to dispose of the final decree proceedings in FDP No.24/2012, as expeditiously as possible, not later than six months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.
- 7 -
NC: 2025:KHC:16769 WP No. 10194 of 2025
7. Parties are directed to cooperate for early disposal of final decree proceedings in FDP No.24/2012.
Sd/- (H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD) JUDGE
HA List No.: 1 Sl No.: 9