Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 21128 (GAU)

TAJ UDDIN CHOUDHURY v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 6 ORS

WP(C)/6553/2023 · 2025-04-29

Michael Zothankhuma

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010251482023 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/6553/2023 TAJ UDDIN CHOUDHURY S/O- MUSABBIR ALI CHOUDHURY, VILL. GORAGRAM, P.O. SUNAPUR, P.S. KATIGORAH, DIST.- CACHAR, ASSAM, PIN- 788817 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 6 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, POWER (ELECTRICITY) DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-06 2:ASSAM POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY LIMITED (APDCL) REPRESENTED BY CHIEF GENERAL MANAGER (HRA) APDCL BIJULEE BHAWAN GUWAHATI- 781001 3:THE MANAGING DIRECTOR APDCL BIJULEE BHAWAN GUWAHATI-01 4:THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM FINANCE DEPARTMENT DISPUR GUWAHATI-06 5:ASST. GENERAL MANAGER SILCHAR ELECTRICAL DIVISION-II APDCL MEHERPUR DIST. CACHAR SILCHAR-15 Page No.# 2/3 6:SUB-DIVISIONAL ENGINEER KALAIN ELECTRICAL SUB-DIVISION DIST. CACHAR PIN- 788015 7:R.V. ELECTRICALS REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR/MANAGER SHOMYOJIT BISWAS SPENCER PLAZA COMPLEX ITKHOLA ROAD TARAPUR SILCHAR DIST.- CACHAR ASSAM PIN- 788001 PH.- 9435174161 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. S B LASKAR, MS D DUTTA,MS N KALITA,MR. H A LASKAR Advocate for the Respondent : SC, APDCL, GA, ASSAM,SC, FINANCE BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MICHAEL ZOTHANKHUMA ORDER 30.04.2025 1. Heard Mr. H.A. Laskar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. N. Sarma, learned counsel for the respondent nos.2, 3 & 5. 2. Mr. N. Sarma submits that subsequent to the filing of the writ petition, the writ petitioner has been given the enhanced wages/pay, vide office order dated 14.12.2023. 3. The office order dated 14.12.2023 is made a part of the record and Page No.# 3/3 marked as Annexure-X. 4. It is needless to add that the enhanced wages will have to be paid to the petitioner in terms of the office order dated 14.12.2023 from the date of coming into force of the office order. 5. In view of the above, the writ petition stands closed. JUDGE Comparing Assistant