Page No.# 1/6 GAHC010250582023 2025:GAU-AS:1877 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/3682/2023 NURJAHAN KHATUN and 4 ORS. W/O LATE AKHTAR HUSSAIN, 2: MD. ENAMUL HUSSAIN SON OF LATE AKHTAR HUSSAIN 3: MD. ANARUL HUSSAIN SON OF LATE AKHTAR HUSSAIN 4: MD. AKRAMUL HUSSAIN SON OF LATE AKHTAR HUSSAIN 5: NAZIA KHATUN DAUGHTER OF LATE AKHTAR HUSSAIN ALL ARE RESIDENT OF CHATIANTALA JACKSON ROAD WARD NO. 6 P.O. AND P.S.- DHUBRI DISTRICT- DHUBRI ASSAM VERSUS CHUM CHUM ARA HAZARIKA and 9 ORS. WIFE OF AZARUR RAHMAN HAZARIKA, RESIDENT OF CHATIANTALA, JACKSON ROAD, WARD NO. 6, P.O. AND P.S.- DHUBRI, DISTRICT- DHUBRI, ASSAM. PRESENTLY RESIDING AT COL. ALI ROAD, OPP. LAKHTOKIA Page No.# 2/6 MASJID NO.1, P.S.- PANBAZAR, GUWAHATI-1, DISTRICT KAMRUP, ASSAM. 2.1:ON THE DEATH OF ALHAJJ JAMAL UDDIN AHMED HIS LEGAL HEIRS 2.1.1:BEHULA KHATUN W/O- LATE ALHAJJ JAMAL UDDIN AHMED VILL- KAIM BHASANI PART-II P.O.-PATAMARI DIST- DHUBRI PIN- 783324. 2.1.2:ROFIQUL ISLAM S/O- LATE ALHAJJ JAMAL UDDIN AHMED VILL- KAIM BHASANI PART-II P.O.-PATAMARI DIST- DHUBRI PIN- 783324. 2.1.3:SHOFIQUL ISLAM S/O- LATE ALHAJJ JAMAL UDDIN AHMED VILL- KAIM BHASANI PART-II P.O.-PATAMARI DIST- DHUBRI PIN- 783324. 2.1.4:KOHINOOR BEGUM D/O- LATE ALHAJJ JAMAL UDDIN AHMED VILL- A.M. CO. ROAD DHUBRI DIST- DHUBRI PIN- 783323. 2.1.5:SHAHNOOR BEGUM D/O- LATE ALHAJJ JAMAL UDDIN AHMED VILL- A.M. CO. ROAD DHUBRI DIST- DHUBRI PIN- 783323. Page No.# 3/6 3:JARINA AHMED D/O- LATE ABDUR RAHMAN RESIDENT OF CHATIANTALA JACKSON ROAD WARD NO. 6 P.O. AND P.S.- DHUBRI DISTRICT- DHUBRI ASSAM. 4:MOSSTT. AFRUJA KHATUN D/O- LATE ABDUR RAHMAN W/O- IRSHAD ALI KHAN RESIDENT OF SECTION-15 QTR NO. H/97 ROURKELA ORISSA. 5:THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE COLLECTOR DHUBRI DISTRICT Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A MOBARAQUE, Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, MR. A HUSSAIN (R-2,1 TO 2.5),R. ALI Linked Case : RSA/172/2014 NURJAHAN KHATUN and 4 ORS. W/O LATE AKHTAR HUSSAIN 2: MD. EMANUL HUSSAIN S/O LATE AKHTAR HUSSAIN 3: MD. ANARUL HUSSAIN S/O LATE AKHTAR HUSSAIN Page No.# 4/6 4: MD. AKRAMUL HUSSAIN S/O LATE AKHTAR HUSSAIN 5: NAZIA KHATUN D/O LATE AKHTAR HUSSAIN ALL ARE R/O CHATIANTALA JACKSON ROAD WARD NO. 6 P.O. and P.S. DHUBRI DIST. DHUBRI ASSAM. VERSUS CHUM CHUM ARA HAZARIKA and 3 ORS. W/O AZADUR RAHMAN HAZARIKA R/O CHATIANTALA JACKSON ROAD WARD NO. 6 P.O. and P.S. DHUBRI DIST. DHUBRI ASSAM PRESENTLY RESIDING AT COL. ALI ROAD OPP. LAKHTOKIA MASJID NO. 1 P.S. PANBAZAR GUWAHATI-1 DIST. KAMRUP ASSAM. 2:ON THE DEATH OF SHARIFA KHATUN HER LEGAL HEIRS REPRESENTED BY- 2.1:ALHAJJ JAMAL UDDIN AHMED S/O LATE YEASIN FAKIR RESIDENT OF NEW GHAT WARD NO 12 P.O.A.M.CO. ROAD DIST DHUBRI PIN 783323 3:JARINA AHMED D/O LATE ABDUR RAHMAN BOTH ARE R/O CHATIANTALA JACKSON ROAD WARD NO. 6 Page No.# 5/6 P.O. and P.S. DHUBRI DIST. DHUBRI ASSAM. 4:MOSSTT. AFRUZA KHATUN BULBUL D/O ABDUL RAHMAN W/O IRSHAD ALI KHAN R/O SECTION 15 QTR. NO. H/97 ROURKELA ORSSA. 5:THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE COLLECTOR DHUBRI DIST. ------------ Advocate for : MR.A T SARKAR Advocate for : MR.P K TALUKDAR appearing for CHUM CHUM ARA HAZARIKA and 3 ORS. BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE MITALI THAKURIA ORDER 21.02.2025 Heard Mr. A. Mobaraque, learned counsel for the applicants. Also heard Mr. M. Boro, learned counsel for the respondent no.1 and Mr. T.R. Gogoi, learned Govt. Advocate for the respondent no.5. This is an application under Order XXII Rule 4 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 for substitution of legal heirs of respondent no. 2(1), who died on 05.07.2023 during the pendency of the present appeal. It is submitted by Mr. Mobaraque, learned counsel for the applicant/appellant that there was some delay in filing the petition for Page No.# 6/6 substitution which has already been condoned by this Court and all the legal heirs of the respondent no.2(1) are necessary party in this case. Accordingly, all the legal heirs of the respondent no. 2(1) are to be substituted as respondent nos. 2.1(a), 2.1 (b), 2.1 (c), 2.1 (d), 2.1 (e) respectively. The names of those respondents are already be reflected in the present petition in para no.4, i.e. 1. Behula Khatun (wife), 2. Rofiqul Islam (son), 3. Shofiqul Islam (son), 4. Kohinoor Begum (daughter) and 5. Shahnoor Begum (daughter). Mr. M. Boro, learned counsel for the respondent no.1 has raised no objection and submitted that the respondent has no objection, if the legal heirs of the deceased respondent no.2 is substituted. The learned Govt. Advocate also submitted that he do not have any objection regarding the said substitution of respondent no.2.1. In view of above, the present petition for substitution is hereby allowed, substituting the names of the legal heirs of the respondent no.2.1, which has already been mentioned today as respondent nos. 2.1(a), 2.1 (b), 2.1 (c), 2.1 (d), 2.1 (e) respectively. Accordingly, the names of the present respondents may be shown in the cause title of the memo of appeal. With the above observation and direction, the present interlocutory application stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant