APHC010297712024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI THURSDAY,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA l A No.1 of 2025 in/and CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 503 OF 2024 Appeal under Section 28 of the Hindu Marriage Act, against the Order and Decree dated 18.03.2024 in H.M.O.P. No.06 of 2021 on the file of the Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Tenali. Between: Tokala Prudhvi Raj, S/o. Late. Tokala Purnachandra Rao, Army Employee, aged about 30 years, R/o. D. No. 10-13-231 Uppudi Road, Repalle, Guntur District. ...Appellant/Petitioner AND Tokala Ramadevi, W/o. Tokala Prudhvi Raj D/o. Pulipaka Moses, aged Residing in Father’s protection, R/o. D.No.1-117, about 32 years. Tsundur, Guntur District. ...Respondent/Respondent lA NQ: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Order 23 Rule 3 R/w Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to allow the CMA No.503 of 2024 by dissolving the marriage dt. 15.11.2019 solemnized between the appellant and respondent by way of mutual consent and in view of their compromise. Counsel for the Appellant: Sri Karanki Yaswanth Counsel for the Respondent: Sri Abdul Hameed Baig Mohamaad The Court made the following: APHC010297712024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3527] THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B. KRISHNA MOHAN THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 503/2024 Between: 1.TOKALA PRUDHVI RAJ, S/0. LATE. TOKALA PURNACHANDRA RAO, ARMY EMPLOYEE, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, R/0. D. NO. 10- 13-231 UPPUDI ROAD, REPALLE, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...APPELLANT AND 1.TOKALA RAMADEVI, W/o. Tokala Prudhvi Raj D/o. Pulipaka Moses aged about 32 years. Residing in Fathers protection, R/o. D.No. 1-117 Tsundur, Guntur District. ...RESPONDENT Counsel for the Appellant: 1. KARAN KIYASWANTH Counsel for the Respondent: 1. ABDUL HAMEED BAIG MOHAMAAD 2 HBKM,J & HAHHSJ C.M.A.No.503 of 2024 I.A.No.l of 2025 IN/AND CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 503/2024 The Court made the following: COMMON JUDGMENT: {Per Hon’ble Sri Justice B. Krishna Mohan) Heard the learned counsel for the appellant and the learned counsel for the respondent. The appellant is present virtually as he is serving in Army in the state of Rajasthan. The respondent is present physically in the Court. 2. Both the parties submitted that they entered into compromise outside 3. the Court and came to a settlement and the same was also acted upon. The details of compromise are furnished through the affidavit filed by both the parties, enclosing the same, the joint memo was also filed by them. In terms of this compromise petition filed by both the parties dated 17.06.2025, this appeal is converted into the petition under mutual consent for grant of decree of divorce by dissolving the marriage between the parties. A 4. On questioning made by the Court, both the parties adhered to the joint memo dated 17.06.2025 and the affidavits enclosed to it. Accordingly, the 5. said compromise is recorded. / / 3 HBKM,J & HAHHS,J C.M.A.No.503 of2024 Both the parties are identified to each other and the counsels appearing for them also identified their parties and the Xerox copies of their I.D. proofs with attestation of the counsels are filed in the Court. 6. 7. Accordingly, the decree of divorce is granted by mutual consent dissolving the marriage between the parties dated 15.11.2019, as according to them all the issues were settled. 8. In view of the same, the Appeal is disposed of strictly in terms of the above said joint memo dated 17.06.2025. Consequently, I.A.No.1 of 2025 is allowed. As a sequel. Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- S.V.S.R.MURTHY JOINT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// <d^^FFICER SEC To, Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Tenali, Guntur District (with records) 1. The 2. One CC to Sri. Karanki Yaswanth Advocate [OPUC] Sri. Abdul Hameed Baig Mohamaad Advocate [OPUC] Officer, VR Section, High Court of Andhra Pradesh at 3. OneCCto 4. The Section Amaravathi 5. Two CD Copies Stu vna ♦along with Photocopy of the joint memo filed in I.A No.l of 2025 HIGH COURT DATED:24/07/2025 COMMON JUDGMENT + DECREE I.A No. 1 of 2025 in/and CMA NO. 503 OF 2024 DISPOSING OF THE APPEAL COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH ;; at AMARAVATl CM.A. No. 503 OF 2024 Is 03 2024 in H.M.O.P. No.O Civil Judge (Senior Division), HIGH (Against the order and decree dated 2021 on the file of the Hon’bie Aod-.. Tenali, Guntur Distncij Between: Tokala Prudhvi Raj, S/o. LateJokala Army Employee, aged about 30 years Uppudi Road, Repalle, Guntur District Purnachandra Rao, X D. No. 10-13-231, ... Appellant/Petitioner And Respondent/Respondent ^^ppEOAjfr^^ and the respondent are the solemnized on iniNlT MEMO FlLEDJYj lant submitted that the appeli wedded couple whose 1. It is humbly marriage was customs. legally 15.11.2019 as per Hindu ntes Due to misunderstanding 3; '0 under section 13(1)(ia)(ib) , the appellant filed a petition 1955 seeking the Hon’ between them of Hindu Marriage Act, ble Trial Court to grant solemnized on numbered dissolving the marriage of divorce by decree 15.11.2019 between me H.M.O.P. No. 6 L Judge (Senior Division), The same was Hon’ble Additional Civil and the appellant. of 2021 .on the file of the as Tenali, Guntur District. , after full length of merits by its order and appellant preferred t the Hon’ble Trial Court 2. It is further submitted thai trial, was pleased to decree dt.18.03.2024 the C.M.A.No.503 of further submitted the intervention of the the said petition on Aggrieved by the same, the 2024 before this Hon’ble Court. of the appeal, due to both sides, appellant that during the pendency elders and relatives of the 3. It is 1 V ' \ the following and respondent entered into Compromise basing on terms and conditions; (i) The appellant paid an amount of f 15,00,000/- (Rupees Fifteen of permanent alimony and Lakhs only) towards settlement maintenance and the same was received by the respondent in two installments i.e.', an amount of f7,00,000/- (Rupees Seven amount of f8,00,000/- Lakhs onjy^ on 03.01.2025 and an (Rupees Eight Lakhs only) on 08.03.2025. of receipt of the said amount the respondent herein compromised the cases in M.C.No. 8 of 2021 and D.V.C.No. 31 the file of the Hon’ble ii Addl. Civil Judge (Junior (ii) In view of 2021 on Division), Tenali, Guntur District on 08.03.2025 before the Hon’ble Lok Adalat,Jenali. and nis family members filed CRLP.No.5554 of of Hon'ble High Court of AP, Amaravati seeking quashment of the case in C.C.No.876 of 2022 on the file of the Hon'ble Hon'ble ,II Addf Civil Judge (Junior Division), Tenali for the alleged offences under (iii)The appellant 2024 on the file which was taken, cognizance section 498-A of IRC and Secs. 3 and 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act. in view of the compromise, the respondent further agreed to •iminal case by allowing the said Criminal compromise the cr Petition. (iv)The appellant and respondent hereby undertake not to interfere in each other personal lives and they will not raise any further litigation in connection to this marriage against them or their family members, submitted appellant and the respondent were not blessed with any children 'f'®'r marital tie. 4. It is further \ ^ 1^' ■ t :5 Tr -eiween the appellant and the 'S' and the mediations made by c-aed to lead separate lives. In view ft may be pleased to allow the n mutual consent of both parties. ■vas irf' ^ ‘ a -n ='5 Provedfutileandwr- -rnpromise, the H -n by dissolving the ma ' -"6 C cjs -C ■w' U r- i“or the reasons stated abov may be pleased to allow th&:Of^;'. marriage dt. 15.11.2019 respondent by way of mutual the interest of justice and and proper in the circumstances of the case. .: is therefore that the Hon’ble Court Nq.503 of 2024 by dissolving the solemnized between the appellant ccnsent and in view of their and compromise in other necessary order as deems fit pass such VT- Appellant / Rxrra-' Respondent \ l c \ \ 1 Counsel for the Appellant ' Coun^fVthe Respondent Amaravati, 03.2025 APHC010297712024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI THURSDAY,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA I.A No.1 of 2025 in/and CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 503 OF 2024 Between: Tokaia Prudhvi Raj, S/o. Late. Tokala Purnachandra Rao,Army Employee, aged about 30 years, R/o: D. No. 10-13-231 Uppudi Road, Repalle, Guntur District. ...Appellant/Petitioner AND Tokala Ramadevi, W/o. Tokala Prudhvi Raj D/o. Pulipaka Moses, aged about 32 years. Tsundur, Guntur District. Residing in Fathers protection, R/o. D.No. 1-117, ...Respondent/Respondent Appeal under Section 28 of the Hindu Marriage Act, against the Order and Decree dated 18.03.2024 passed in H.M.O.P. No.06 of 2021 on the file of the Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Tenali. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 . Petition under Order 23 Rule 3 R/w Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to allow the CMA No.503 of 2024 by dissolving the marriage dt. 15.11.2019 solemnized between the appellant and respondent by way of mutual consent and in view of their compromise. The Civil Miscellaneous Appeal and I.A.No.1 of 2025 coming this day for order as to settlement in the presence of Sri Karanki Yaswanth, Advocate for the Appellant and of Sri Abdul Hameed Baig Mohamaad, Advocate for Respondent. Appellant and the Respondent through respective advocates having filed I.A.No.1 of 2025 requesting the court to pass decree in terms of Joint Memorandum of Compromise entered into between them and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, Judgment and decree of the Trial Court and the Joint Memorandum of Compromise purporting to have been signed by the parties and their advocates and filed with the said I.A.No.1 of 2025 and it is appearing from the said Memorandum of compromise that the parties herein have entered into compromise and settled the matter in terms of compromise filed in IA.No.1 of 2025. This Court DOTH RECORD the terms of the said Joint Memorandum of Compromise the original whereof is filed in the record of the said I.A.No.1 of 2025 and a copy whereof is annexed hereto and Doth in terms of the said Memorandum of Compromise, order and decree as follows: 1. That the appeal be and is hereby disposed of strictly in terms of the joint memo dated 17.06.2025; 2. That the decree of divorce be and is hereby granted by mutual consent; 3. That the marriage between the parties dated 15.11.2019 be and is hereby dissolved, as according to them all the issues were settled; 4. That the I.A No.1 of 2025 be and is hereby allowed; 5. That the terms and conditions of the said joint memorandum of compromise between the parties are That the appellant paid an amount of f 15,00,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Lakhs only) towards settlement of permanent alimony and maintenance and the same was received by the respondent in two installments i.e., an amount of ?7,00,000/- (Rupees Seven Lakhs only) on 03.01.2025 and an amount of f8,00,000/-(Rupees Eight Lakhs only) on 08.03.2025. That in view of receipt of the said amount, the respondent herein compromised the cases in M.C.No. 8 of 2021 and D.V.C.No. 31 of 2021 on the file of the Hon'ble II Addl. Civil Judge (Junior Division), Tenali, Guntur District on 08.03.2025 before the Hon'ble Lok Adalat, Tenali. That the appellant and his family members filed CRLP.No.5554 of 2024 on the file of Hon'ble High Court of AP, Amaravati seeking quashment of the case in C.C.No.875 of 2022 on the file of the Hon'ble Hon'ble II Addl. Civil Judge (Junior Division), Tenali which taken cognizance for the alleged offences under section 498-A of IPC and Secs. 3 and 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act. In view of the compromise, the respondent further agreed to compromise the criminal case by allowing the said Criminal Petition. That the appellant and respondent hereby undertake not to interfere in each other personal lives and they will not raise any further litigation in connection to this marriage against them or their family members. That the appellant and the respondent were not blessed with any children during their marital tie. That the marriage between the appellant and the respondent was irretrievably broken and the mediations made by elders were I. ii. III. was IV. V. VI. ■‘f ■ / proved futile and both the parties decided to lead separate lives. In view of the compromise, the Hon'ble Court may be pleased to allow the petition by dissolving the marriage on mutual consent of both parties. Sd/- S.V.S.R.MURTHY JOINT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTIONUFFICER To. 1. The Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Tenali, Guntur District Two CD Copies 2. vna 3; if i HIGH COURT DATED:24/07/2025 DECREE I.A No. 1 of 2025 in/and CMA NO. 503 OF 2024 DISPOSING OF THE APPEAL