1 COCP-1199-2022 (O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP-1199-2022 (O&M) Date of Decision: August 29, 2025 Poonam ......Petitioner Vs. Gulshan Taneja .....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA Present: Mr. Jaswinder Singh Nagla, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Amit Rao, Advocate for Mr. Anurag Goyal, Advocate for the respondent. **** SUDEEPTI SHARMA J. (Oral) 1. The present contempt petition has been filed for non-compliance of order dated 24.08.2020 passed by Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in CWP-12556-2020. 2. The relevant portion of order dated 24.08.2020 passed by Co-ordinate Bench of this Court is reproduced as under:- “The matter has been taken up through video-conferencing in the light of the pandemic COVID-19 situation and as per instructions. Cites Hargurpratap Singh Vs. State of Punjab and others, 2007(13) SCC 292 (Annexure P-7) and CWP No. 9300 of 2015 titled as Mrs. Menka and others Versus State of Haryana and others decided by this Court on 05.05.2016 (Annexure P-10). Notice of motion for 18.09.2020. At the asking of the Court, Ms. Upasana Dhawan, A.A.G., Haryana, accepts notice on behalf of the respondent-State. List along with CWP-23525-2018. GAURAV ARORA 2025.09.01 10:39 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 2 COCP-1199-2022 (O&M) Interim order in the same terms” 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that during the pendency of the present contempt petition, CWP No. 12556-2020 filed by the petitioner is dismissed on 10.09.2024. Therefore, he wants to withdraw the present contempt petition. 4. In view of the above, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn. (SUDEEPTI SHARMA) JUDGE August 29, 2025 Gaurav Arora Whether speaking/non-speaking : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No GAURAV ARORA 2025.09.01 10:39 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document