APHC010298082000 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI TUESDAY,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V. GOPALA KRISHNA RAO FIRST APPEAL NO: 1392 OF ?nnn Appeal under section 96 of C.P.C against the Judgment and Decree 21.03.2000 in O.S No.260 of 1992 Senior Civil Judge, Visakapatnam. Between: 1. Kolluru Prem Swaroop, S/o late K.K. Bhanumurthy Hindu aged 38 years. Business Near Super Bazar, Visakhapatnam-2 2. Kolluru Basant Kumar, S/o late K.K. Bhanumurthy Hindu aged 38 years. Business Near Super Bazar, Visakhapatnam-2 on the file of the Court of the Principal ...APPELLANTS/DEFENDANTS 2 & 3 AND 1. P V S R Sarma, S/o late Bhuwaneswara Rao Hindu Engineer in Dunlop R/o 73-E, MIG Flats (Z-121), Vth Avenue, Anna Nagar, Madras-40 2. P Suguna Rani, W/o P.V.S.R.Sarma Hindu aged 44 years. Household R/o 73-E, MIG Flats (Z-121), Vth Avenue, Anna Nagar, Madras-40 aged 54 years. f 3. K Rajeswari, W/o late K.K. Bhanumurthy Hindu aged 66 years, Household R/o Lodge Basant, Aseelmetta Junction, Visakhapatnam-3 / (R3 Disd for default C.O dated 8/2/2011) ...RESPONDENTS/PLAINTIFFS & D.1 Counsel for the Petitioners : SRI CH MARKONDAIAH Counsel for the Respondents : SRI SATYAMNAIDU GOLIVI The Court made the following JUDGMENT : 7) the HON’BLE SRt JUSTtCE V.GOPALA KRISHNA RAO appeal suit /; JUDGMENT! When the matter was listed on 23.06.2025 representation on behalf of the appellants. there is no Learned counsel for the was posted for today under respondents is present and the matter the caption “For Dismissal”. 2. Today when the matter is listed under the caption Dismissal”, learned the learned counsel for the party is not approaching him and there party. As seen from the material For counsel appearing for both sides is present and appellants has represented that the are no instructions from the on record, registered notices same were served on IS listed under the caption “For Dismissal”, are not inclined to were sent to the appellants by the Registry and the them. Though the matter i it seems that the appellants prosecute the appeal. 3. Accordingly, the Appeal Suit i costs. IS dismissed for default. No As a sequel, miscellaneous stand closed. petitions, if any pending, shall SD/- K.TATA RAO deputy REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// nr SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The Principal Senior Civil Judge, Visakapatnam (with records) / t» 2. One CC to SRI. CH MARKONDAIAH One CC to SRI. SATYAMNAIDU GOLIVI The Section Officer, VR Section three CD COPIES Advocate [OPUC] Advocate [OPUC] High Court of Andhra Pradesh 3. 4. 5. TAC HIGH COURT DATED:24/06/2025 ORDER AS NO. 1392 OF 2000 DISMISSING THE AS FOR default i ( 1 j