M/s KRR INFRA PROJECTS (P) LTD v. The Assistant General Manager
WP/32133/2012 · 2025-08-11
Sumathi Jagadam
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 21108 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 21108 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010298222012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 32133/2012 Between:
1. M/S KRR INFRA PROJECTS (P) LTD, A PRAVITE LIMITED COMPANY, HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT:
204, SATYA SAI RESIDENTCY, DHARAM KARAM ROAD, AMEERPET, HYDERABAD, THROUGH ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR. K.RAGHAVA REDDY S/O. K V SUB
1. THE ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER, (ENGINEERING AIRPORTS AUTHORITY OF INDIA, TIRUPATHI AIRPORT, RENIGUNTA, AP. 2. THE AIRPORTS AUTHORITY OF INDIA, REP. BY ITS CHAIRMEN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR, ENGINEERING WING, RAJIV GANDHI BHAVAN, SAFDRAGUNG AIRPORT NEW DELHI 110003. 3. THE UNION OF INDIA, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, MINISTARY OF CIVIL AVIATION DEPARTMENT CENTRAL SECRETA DELHI. Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus to declaring the action of the respondents herein pending the dispute before the Dispute Resolution Committee constituted by the respondents dt. 10.9.2012 under clause agreement in respect of the termination of the contract including encashment of the bank guarantees of the 1st respondent proceedings dt. 25.6.2012, ignoring the same they are trying to calling the tenders by encashing the bank IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 32133/2012 M/S KRR INFRA PROJECTS (P) LTD, A PRAVITE LIMITED COMPANY, HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT:- D.NO.7-1-54/1, FLAT NO. 204, SATYA SAI RESIDENTCY, DHARAM KARAM ROAD, AMEERPET, HYDERABAD, THROUGH ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR. K.RAGHAVA REDDY S/O. K V SUBBA REDDY AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS ...PETITIONER AND THE ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER, (ENGINEERING AIRPORTS AUTHORITY OF INDIA, TIRUPATHI AIRPORT, THE AIRPORTS AUTHORITY OF INDIA, REP. BY ITS CHAIRMEN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR, ENGINEERING WING, RAJIV GANDHI BHAVAN, SAFDRAGUNG AIRPORT NEW DELHI 110003. THE UNION OF INDIA, REP.
BY ITS SECRETARY, MINISTARY OF CIVIL AVIATION DEPARTMENT CENTRAL SECRETARIAT, NEW ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus to declaring the action of the respondents herein pending the dispute before the Dispute Resolution Committee constituted by the respondents dt. 10.9.2012 under clause 25 of the contract agreement in respect of the termination of the contract including encashment of the bank guarantees of the 1st respondent proceedings dt. 25.6.2012, ignoring the same they are trying to calling the tenders by encashing the bank IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3459] THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM M/S KRR INFRA PROJECTS (P) LTD, A PRAVITE LIMITED COMPANY, 54/1, FLAT NO. 204, SATYA SAI RESIDENTCY, DHARAM KARAM ROAD, AMEERPET, HYDERABAD, THROUGH ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR. K.RAGHAVA ...PETITIONER THE ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER, (ENGINEERING -CIVIL) AIRPORTS AUTHORITY OF INDIA, TIRUPATHI AIRPORT, THE AIRPORTS AUTHORITY OF INDIA, REP. BY ITS CHAIRMEN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR, ENGINEERING WING, RAJIV GANDHI THE UNION OF INDIA, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, MINISTARY OF RIAT, NEW ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus to declaring the action of the respondents herein pending the dispute before the Dispute Resolution Committee 25 of the contract agreement in respect of the termination of the contract including encashment of the bank guarantees of the 1st respondent proceedings dt.
25.6.2012, ignoring the same they are trying to calling the tenders by encashing the bank
2
guarantee of the petitioner is highly illegal arbitrary and contrary to the clause of the contract agreement and violative of the article 14, 16, 21 of the constitution of the India and consequentially direct the respondents not to proceed further under the proceedings of the 1st respondent dt. 25.6.2012 in view of the pendency of the dispute before the Dispute Resolution Committee dt. 10.9.2012 under clause 25 of the contract agreement IA NO: 1 OF 2012(WPMP 40968 OF 2012 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to proceed further under the proceedings of the 1st respondent dt. 25.6.2012 in view of the pendency of the dispute before the Dispute Resolution Committee dt. 10.9.2012 under cluse 25 of the contract agreement IA NO: 4 OF 2012(WPMP 174560 OF 2012 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. KAMLA SEELAM B Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. 284/E MADAN MOHAN RAO
2. K LAKSHMAN (AST SOL GEN)
3. 12812/N V RAMANUJAM(SC FOR CENTRAL GOVT ) The Court made the following ORDER:
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive. Recording the submission of learned counsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________
JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Date: 12.08.2025 GRL
3
199
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 32133 of 2012
Date: 12.08.2025 GRL