Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 21107 (CHH)

BHAGWAT PRASAD KASHYAP v. ARUN DEV GAUTAM (IPS)

CONT/605/2024 · 2025-01-16

Shri Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi

Contempt Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:2718 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CONT No. 605 of 2024 Bhagwat Prasad Kashyap S/o. Late Shri Premchand Kashyap, Aged About 59 Years R/o Village And Post Katnai, Police Station Akaltara, District Janjgir Champa, Chhattisgarh. ... Applicant versus 1 - Arun Dev Gautam (IPS) Working And Posted As Director General (Home Guards) Home Guards Headquarters, Mana, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - S. K. Thakur Working And Posted As Divisional Commandant (Home Guards) Bilaspur Division Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 3 - P. B. Sidar Working As Posted As District Commandant (Home Guards) Korba, District Korba Chhattisgarh. ... Respondents (Cause title, as taken from CIS) For Applicant : Mr. Shishir Dixit, Advocate For Respondents No.1 & 2 For Respondent No.3 : : Mr. U.N.S. Deo, Advocate Mr. Satish Gupta, Advocate (Hon’ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi ) Order on Board 16/01/2025 1. This Contempt petition has been preferred by applicant under Article 215 of the Constitution of India read with Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 for non-compliance of the order dated 28.2.2024 (Annexure-C/1) passed in WP(S) No.7089/2017. 2. Learned counsel for the applicant would submit that the order under contempt dated 28.2.2024 (Annexure-C/1) passed by this Court in 2 WP(S) No.7089/2017 has been complied with and applicant is fully satisfied with that order, therefore, nothing remains in the instant contempt petition to proceed further. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents also conceded the aforesaid fact. 4. In view of above contention, since the order under contempt has been complied with, as such, no case of contempt is made out, therefore, this contempt petition is dismissed. 5. Accordingly, the rule issued to respondents is discharged and contempt proceeding is dropped. Sd/- (Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) Judge Rukhsar RUKHSAR BANO Digitally signed by RUKHSAR BANO Date: 2025.01.17 17:34:09 +0530