Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 21105 (GAU)

SHANTI PRABHA BARMAN DAS v. RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. AND 3 ORS.

I.A.(Civil)/3286/2023 · 2025-08-03

Parthivjyoti Saikia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010249652023 2025:GAU-AS:10045 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/3286/2023 SHANTI PRABHA BARMAN DAS W/O LATE TAPAN KR. DAS, R/O ABHYAPURI TOWN, SAHITYA SABHA PATH, WARD NO.3, P.O. AND P.S. ABHYAPURI, DIST. BONGAIGAON, ASSAM, PIN 783380 VERSUS RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. AND 3 ORS. HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT 19 RELIANCE CENTRE, WALCHAND HIRACHAND MARG, BALLARD ESTATE, MUMBAI-400001 AND ONE OF ITS BRANCH OFFICE AT ABC, G.S. ROAD, GUWAHATI-781005. 2:MD. ATIKULLAH KHAN R/O VILL. MATHURI R/O MATHURI P.O. NOWANAGAR BALLIA PIN 277001.H UTTAR PRADESH. OWNER OF THE VEHICLE NO. UP-60-T-0016 TRUCK. 3:MD. ATIQUELLAH KHAN S/O MD. S. KHAN R/O MEELORD STREET KOLKATA-700016 WEST BENGAL. DRIVER OF THE VEHICLE NO. UP-60-T-0016 TRUCK 4:THE DIVISIONAL MANAGER UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD. BONGAIGAON DIVISIONAL OFFICE MAIN ROAD BONGAIGAON ASSAM. INSURER OF VEHICLE NO. AS-19-D-8858 HYUNDAI I-20 Page No.# 2/2 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR D C NATH, MR. C SHARMA Advocate for the Respondent : MR. K K BHATTA, MS R DEVI,MR J JOHN :: BEFORE :: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHIVJYOTI SAIKIA O R D E R 04.08.2025 Heard Mr. S.K. Poddar, the learned counsel appearing for the applicant. Also heard Mr. K.K. Bhattacharjee, learned counsel representing the Insurance Company. Mr. S. Pegu, the learned counsel appears for Respondent No.4. 2. This application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act has been filed praying for condonation of 20 days of delay in filing the cross-objection against the judgment and order dated 26.09.2019 passed by the learned Member, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Bongaigaon in MAC Case No.84/2012. 3. This Court is of the opinion that the delay has been satisfactorily explained. Therefore, the delay stands condoned. The cross-objection shall be registered and listed for Admission hearing. JUDGE Comparing Assistant