Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2025:CGHC:20868
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 3217 of 2025 1 - Praveen Kumar Kuldeep S/o Late S. R. Kuldeep Aged About 47 Years Presently Working As Accountant, Office Of The Chief Medical And Health Officer, District- Bijapur (C.G.) R/o Indira Awas Para, Near Mining Office, Adawal Halbakachora, Post- Adawal, Jagdalpur, District- Bastar (C.G.)
... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Health And Family Welfare, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Nawa Raipur, Atal Nagar, Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Director Health Services, Indrawati Bhawan, Nawa Raipur, Atal Nagar, Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) 3 - The
Collector Bijapur,
District- Bijapur (C.G.) SHOAIB ANWAR Digitally signed by SHOAIB ANWAR Date: 2025.05.08 23:22:25 +0530
2 4 - Divisional Joint Director Health Services, Baster Division, Jagdalpur, District- Bastar (C.G.) 5 - Chief Medical And Health Officer Bijapur, District- Bijapur (C.G.) 6 - Shri Kaka Narayan Head Copyist, Presently Working In The Office Of Chief Medical And Health Officer, Bijapur, District- Bijapur (C.G.) As Accountant
... Respondent(s) (Cause title taken from CIS) For Petitioner(s) : Shri Rishikant Mahobia, Advocate with Shri Shrikant Kaushik, Advocate. For Respondent(s) : Shri Sabyasachi Choubey, Panel Lawyer. Hon'ble Shri
Bibhu Datta Guru
, Judge
Order on Board 07.05.2025
1. By the present writ petition, the petitioner is seeking a direction towards the respondent for consideration of the grievance of the petitioner, by which the petitioner has raised a grievance that though the petitioner has been posted as Accountant in the Office of Chief Medical and Health Officer, District Bijapur, but the charge of the said post is not being provided to the petitioner. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has submitted several representations before the respondent no. 5, but the same has not been decided till date. 3
3. Learned State counsel would submit that if the representation is still pending before the respondent no. 5, the same shall be considered in accordance with law, within a period of 30 days. 4. I have heard learned counsels for the parties and perused the documents. 5.
In view of the submission made by the counsel for the State, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the concerned authorities/ respondent No.5 to decide the pending representation submitted by the petitioner in accordance with law, within a period of 30 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 6. With the aforesaid direction, the writ petition is disposed of. Sd/-
(Bibhu Datta Guru) Judge Shoaib