APHC010298442020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 19729/2020 Between: 1. K.RESHMA, W/O KHADER BASHA AGED ABOUT 23YRS R/O H.NO.12-61, MULLAR STREET KOWTHALAM VILLAGE AND MANDAL KURNOOL DISTRICT 2. SOYA THIMMAKKA, W/O B.OBULESU AGED ABOUT 35 YRS R/O UPPARAHALLU VILLAGE KOWTHALAM MANDAL KURNOOL DISTRICT ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY HOME DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, POLICE HEADQUARTERS MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KURNOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT 4. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ADONI, KURNOOL DISTRICT 5. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, KOWTHALAM POLICE STATION, KURNOOL DISTRICT 6. MR NAGARJUNA REDDY, S/O NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER SUB-INSPECTOR C/O KOWTHALAM POLICE STATION KURNOOL DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus to declare the action of the respondent Nos.2 and 3 in not initiating any action upon the complaint, dt.15.08.2020 and representation, dt.20-08-2020 submitted by the petitioners as arbitrary, illegal and violation of Articles 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to initiate appropriate action against 2 the 5th/6th respondent based on the complaint, dt.15-08-2020 86 representation, dt.20-08-2020 given by the petitioners and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. B SARVOTHAM REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: The instant Writ Petition is filed by the Petitioners seeking indulgence of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief: “ .... to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus to declare the action of the respondent Nos.2 and 3 in not initiating any action upon the complaint, dt.15.08.2020 and representation, dt.20-08-2020 submitted by the petitioners as arbitrary, illegal and violation of Articles 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to initiate appropriate action against the 5th/6th respondent based on the complaint, dt.15-08-2020 86 representation, dt.20-08-2020 given by the petitioners and pass ....” 2. None represented for the Petitioners. 3. None represented for the Petitioners. 3. Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on instructions, would submit that respondent Police never received any complaint from the Petitioners and that no further orders are necessary and this Writ Petition may be disposed of by passing appropriate orders. 4. Considering the submission, this Writ Petition is disposed of. Petitioners are at liberty to work out their remedy according to law by making fresh representation to the concerned Police. No order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/* 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Writ Petition No. 19729 of 2020 04.09.2025 Mjl /*