Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 21101 (CHH)

Ramesh Kumar Yadav v. State of Chhattisgarh

WPC/1832/2019 · 2025-01-24

Shri Rakesh Mohan Pandey

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:CGHC:4444 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 1832 of 2019 1 - Ramesh Kumar Yadav S/o Devnarayan Aged About 29 Years R/o Village Barhol, Block Barual, Tejpur, Surajpur, District Surajpur Chhattisgarh., District : Surajpur, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Home, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Social Welfare, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - Director General Of Police Police Head Quarter, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 4 - Collector Surajpur, District Surajpur Chhattisgarh., District : Surajpur, Chhattisgarh 5 - Superintendent Of Police Surajpur, District Surajpur Chhattisgarh., District : Surajpur, Chhattisgarh 6 - Sub Divisional Magistrate Surajpur, District Surajpur Chhattisgarh., District : Surajpur, Chhattisgarh 7 - Station House Officer Police Station Ramanujnagar, District Balrampur Chhattisgarh., District : Balrampur, Chhattisgarh 8 - Akhil Bhartiya Yadav Mahasabha Through Its President Shivbhajan Yadav R/o Village Tendua, Post Patna, Police Station And Tahsil Baikunthpur, District Korea Chhattisgarh., District : Koriya (Baikunthpur), Chhattisgarh 9 - Vasudev Yadav S/o Jawahar Yadav Aged About 22 Years R/o Village Chhuri, Post Pondibachara, Police Station And Tahsil Khandgaon, District Korea Chhattisgarh., District : Koriya (Baikunthpur), Chhattisgarh -2- 10 - Jawahar Yadav R/o Village Chhuri, Post Pondibachara, Police Station And Tahsil Khadgaon, District Korea Chhattisgarh., District : Koriya (Baikunthpur), Chhattisgarh 11 - Kamlesh Yadav S/o Shankar Prasad Yadav Aged About 48 Years R/o Village Budhar, Police Station And Tahsil Baikunthpur, District Korea Chhattisgarh., District : Koriya (Baikunthpur), Chhattisgarh 12 - Kailash Yadav S/o Late Meva Lal Yadav Aged About 58 Years R/o Village Kasara, Police Station Patna, Tahsil Baikunthpur, District Korea Chhattisgarh., District : Koriya (Baikunthpur), Chhattisgarh 13 - Devdhari Yadav S/o Nohar Yadav Aged About 62 Years R/o Village Amgaon, Post And Police Station Baikunthpur, District Korea Chhattisgarh., District : Koriya (Baikunthpur), Chhattisgarh 14 - Rameshwar Yadav S/o Sukhnandan Aged About 47 Years R/o Village Barhol, Post Tejpur, Police Station Ramanujnagar, Tahsil Ramanujnagar, District Surajpur Chhattisgarh., District : Surajpur, Chhattisgarh 15 - Hari Prasad S/o Ramsahai Aged About 53 Years R/o Village Barhol, Post Tejpur, Police Station Ramanujnagar, Tahsil Ramanujnagar, District Surajpur Chhattisgarh., District : Surajpur, Chhattisgarh 16 - Manijar S/o Ramsahai Aged About 49 Years R/o Village Barhol, Post Tejpur, Police Station Ramanujnagar, Tahsil Ramanujnagar, District Surajpur Chhattisgarh., District : Surajpur, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Emam Siddiqui, Advocate holding the brief of Mr. Syed Majid Ali, Advocate For respective respondents : Mr. Lav Sharma, PL and Ms. Harshika Pandey, Advocate holding the brief of Mr. Pushkar Sinha, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 24.01.2025 1. The petitioner has filed this petition seeking the following relief (s) : “10.1 This Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the State Official particularly the respondent No.1 & 7 to take appropriate preventive punitive measure to curb the malpractices adopted by the private respondents, which includes social boycott. 10.2 This Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to initiate adequate steps to ensure the guidelines issued by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Sakti Vahini Vs. Union of India 10.3 That the Hon'ble Court further pleased to grant such other relief(s) as may be deemed fit and proper in the interest of justice.” 2. Learned counsel for the State would submit that the pursuant to the complaint made by the petitioner, a case under Section 107 and 116(3) of Cr.P.C. was registered against the private respondents. He would further submit that subsequently, the petitioner and the private respondents entered into compromise and the copy of settlement is placed on record. 3. Taking into consideration the fact that the proper action was taken against the private respondents and the parties have settled their dispute, nothing survives for adjudication in this matter. Consequently, the present petition is disposed of. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge Rekha