W.P(MD)No. 29858 of 2025 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED :24.10.2025 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY W.P(MD)No. 29858 of 2025 Suba ... Petitioner Vs 1. The Sub Collector Cum Revenue Divisional Officer, O/o. the Revenue Divisional Office, Paramakudi Division, Ramanathapuram District. 2. The District Adi Dravidar Welfare Officer, O/o Adi Dirvidar Welfare Department, District Collectorate Office, Ramanathapuram District. 3. The Special Tahsildar, Adi Dirvidar Welfare Department, Parmakudi Taluk Office, Paramakudi Taluk, Ramanathapuram District. 4. Kaliyammal ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus to direct the third respondent to conduct an enquiry in the light of the first respondent's proceeding in Na.Ka.No.A6/5402-2025 dated 01.07.2025. 1/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD)No. 29858 of 2025 For Petitioner : Mr. K.Yasar Arafath For Respondents : Mr.K.R.Badurus Zaman Government Advocate for R1 to R3 O R D E R The fourth respondent had borrowed a sum of ?3,00,000/- from the petitioner. The petitioner alleges that the said amount has not been repaid till date. On the basis that three plots were allotted to the fourth respondent wrongly, the petitioner had made a representation in relation thereto. By this Writ Petition, the petitioner seeks an inquiry in relation thereto. 2. Learned Government Advocate accepts notice for respondents 1 to 3. He has placed on record documents showing that natham patta was issued in the name of Kaliammal, wife of Manoharan, in respect of Natham Survey No.135/9 and that natham patta was issued in the name of Kaliammal, wife of Kulandhavelu, in respect of Natham Survey No. 135/84. Similarly, he points out that the natham patta was issued to Kalimammal, wife of Sundarraj, in respect of Natham Survey No.135/87. 2/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD)No. 29858 of 2025 Therefore, he submits that there was no infirmity in the issuance of pattas to these three persons. 3. As a lender, if the loan is not repaid, it is open to the petitioner to initiate appropriate legal proceedings to recover money due to the petitioner. Instead, the petitioner has attempted to harass the fourth respondent by raising a complaint that the fourth respondent had received natham pattas in relation to three plots. I find no merit in the request of the petitioner and no reason to exercise discretionary jurisdiction in favour of the petitioner. 4. For reasons stated above, this Writ Petition is dismissed without any order as to costs. NCS : Yes/No 24.10.2025 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No apd 3/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD)No. 29858 of 2025 To 1. The Sub Collector Cum Revenue Divisional Officer, O/o. the Revenue Divisional Office, Paramakudi Division, Ramanathapuram District. 2. The District Adi Dravidar Welfare Officer, O/o Adi Dirvidar Welfare Department, District Collectorate Office, Ramanathapuram District. 3. The Special Tahsildar, Adi Dirvidar Welfare Department, Parmakudi Taluk Office, Paramakudi Taluk, Ramanathapuram District. 4/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD)No. 29858 of 2025 SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY.,J. apd ORDER MADE IN W.P(MD)No. 29858 of 2025 24.10.2025 5/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis