KAFIRUDDIN @ MD KAFURUDDIN AND ANR. v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL
CRM (A)/1415/2025 · 2025-05-05
Jay Sengupta
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 21089 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 21089 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
05.05.2025 Court No.28 Item No.27 ssi CRM (A) 1415 of 2025
In Re: - An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Suraksha Nagarik Sanhita in connection with Karandighi PS Case No.494 of 2024 dated 20.10.2024 under Sections 126(2)/115(2)/118(2)/109/324(2)/351 (2)/3(5) of the BNSS. And In the matter of: Kafiruddin @ Md. Kafuruddin & another.
….Applicants/Petitioners.
Mr. Jisan Iqubal Hossain
….for the petitioners
Md. Habibur Rahman …for the de facto complainant
Mr. Partha Pratim Das Mr. Shashanka Shekhar Saha
..for the State
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submits as follows. A fight took place between two groups out of previous grudge. The learned Session Judge allowed anticipatory bail to four other co-accuseds.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the de facto complainant strongly opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State relies on the injury reports and the statements of the victims and other witnesses. He submits that there was a stab injury so deep that the guts came out. Other than that there was a fracture injury on the rib of a victim.
Considering the incriminating materials available in the case diary, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.
2
Accordingly, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners is rejected. (Jay Sengupta, J.)