Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 21087 (GAU)

SEWALI SINGHA DAS v. RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. AND 3 ORS.

I.A.(Civil)/3293/2023 · 2025-09-18

Susmita Phukan Khaund

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010249642023 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/3293/2023 SEWALI SINGHA DAS W/O- LATE SANJOY KR. DAS, R/O- MALEGARH, P.O.- MALEGARH, P.S.- JOGIGHOPA, DIST.- BONGAIGAON, ASSAM 783384. VERSUS RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. AND 3 ORS. HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT 19 RELIANCE CENTRE, WALCHAND HIRACHAND MARG, BALLARD ESTATE, MUMBAI 400001 AND ONE OF ITS BRANCH OFFICE AT ABC, G.S ROAD, GUWAHATI. 2:ATIKULLAH KHAN R/O- VILL- MATHURI P.O- NOWANAGAR BALLIA PIN- 277001 UTTAR PRADESH 3:ATIQUELLAH KHAN S/O- MD. S KHAN R/O- MEELORD STREET KOLKATA- 700016 WEST BENGAL 4:THE DIVISIONAL MANAGER UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO LTD BONGAIGAON DIVISIONAL OFFICE MAIN ROAD BONGAIGAON ASSA Advocate for the Petitioner : MR D C NATH, MR. C SHARMA Page No.# 2/3 Advocate for the Respondent : MR. K K BHATTA, MR J JOHN,MS R DEVI BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SUSMITA PHUKAN KHAUND ORDER Date : 19.09.2025 Heard learned counsel Mr. S.K.Poddar for the applicant/ respondent who has filed the Cross Objection against the connected MAC Appeal no.602/2022. 2. Learned counsel Ms. L.Sharma is present for the opposite party/ appellant and learned counsel Mr. B.K.Baruah is present for the respondent no.4. 3. It is submitted that there was a delay of 20 days in preparing the Cross Objection against the MAC Appeal no.602/2022. 4. The learned counsel for the insurance company and respondent no.4 have no objection. 5. Delay has also been properly explained. It appears that there is no malafide on the part of the applicant. 6. Accordingly, the delay of 20 days in filing the cross-objection is hereby condoned. 7. Registry to register the Cross Objection filed by the applicant and list the Cross Objection. 8. The interlocutory application stands disposed of. JUDGE Page No.# 3/3 Comparing Assistant