Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 21085 (AP)

DERANGULA DURGA RAO v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/15101/2025 · 2025-06-23

Challa Gunaranjan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: (Special Original Jurisdiction) AMARA^ k / TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF JUN^^ TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE ^8 PRESENT THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN WRIT PETITION NO: 151Q1 OF Between: Derangula Durga Rao, S/o. Jai Andhra Subordinate. R/o. H.No.8-29-64123 District, Andhra Pradesh. Age 55 Years, Occ; Office Gaddipadu, Ganesh Nagar, Guntur ...PETITIONER AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by Government, Velagapudi, Amaravathi. 2. The Commissioner and Directorate of Municipal Administration Pradesh, Vaddeswaram, Mangalagiri, Guntur District. 3. The Guntur Municipal Corporation, Rep by its Commissioner. Guntur Guntur District. its Principal Secretary to Secretariat Buildings Municipal Administration , Andhra ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court be pleased to issue a direction, an order or the nature of may a writ more particularly one in a writ of mandamus declaring that the action of the 3rd duties as Office at Guntur illegal, arbitrary and violation of of the Constitution of the India, to allow the petitioner for respondent not allowing the petitioner for discharging his Subordinate in the office of the Guntur Municipal Corporation Without following due process of law as Article 14 and 21 and 300-A and consequently direct the respondent authorities duties as a Office Subordinate in the office of the Guntur Municipal Corporation at Guntur. IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be to allow the petitioner for discharging duties as a Office Subordinate in the office of the Guntur Municipal Corporation at Guntur. pleased to direct the respondent authorities Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI VALLEPU JAGADEESH Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1 & 2: GP FOR SERVICES REPRESENTING SRI A S C BOSE (SC FOR MUNICIPAL The Court made the following: ORDER I CORPORATIONS) APHC010297452025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3506] TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN WRIT PETITION NO: 15101/2025 Between: Derangula Durga Rao ...PETITIONER AND ...RESPONDENT(S) The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.VALLEPU JAGADEESH Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR SERVICES I 2 HCGRJ W.P.No.15101 of 2025 The Court made the following order: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief/s:- “...to issue a direction, an order or a writ more particularly one in the nature of a writ of mandamus declaring that the action of the 3"'' respondent not allowing the petitioner for discharging his duties as Office Subordinate in the office of the Guntur Municipal Corporation at Guntur without following due process of law as illegal, arbitrary and violation of Articles 14 and 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of the India, and consequently direct the respondent authorities to allow the petitioner for discharging duties as a Office Subordinate in the office of the Guntur Municipal Corporation at Guntur and pass such other order or orders....” 2. Heard Sri V.Jagadeesh, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Services-I for respondent Nos.1 and 2 and Sri Harsha S.Ammineni, learned counsel, representing Sri A.S.C.Bose, learned Standing Counsel for respondent No.3. 3. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that petitioner is not being allowed to discharge duties as Office Subordinate. 4. Refuting aforesaid submission, learned Standing Counsel placed on record written instructions dated 23.06.2025, inter alia stating that petitioner is absenting to duties on his own and not on account of the respondents not allowing to discharge his duties and if petitioner intends to attend to duties, the respondents have no objection to allow him. IP 3 HC<SR,J W.P.No.15101 of 2025 5. It is stated that based on certain allegations, petitioner issued show cause notice dated 14.05.2025, for which explanation has been offered on 20.05.2025 and that inquiry is going on. was 6. In view of aforesaid submissions, without expressing any opinion on ongoing inquiry, the Writ Petition is disposed of, directing the respondents to allow the petitioner to attend to duties, if he is so desires. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- K. TATA RAO DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// To, SECTION OFFICER ^ Principal Secretary to Government, Secretariat Buildings Velagapudi, Amaravathi. Directorate of Municipal Administration Pradesh, Vaddeswaram, Mangalagiri, Guntur District. ^ Municipal 4. One CC to Sri Vallepu Jagadeesh, Advocate [OPUC] ^ [OPUC]^ Sri A S C Bose (SC for Municipal 6. Two CCs to GP for Services I 7. Three CD Copies Municipal Administration , Andhra Corporation, Guntur, Guntur Corporations) Advocate High Court of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT] TF HIGH COURT DATED:24/06/2025 ORDER WP.No.15101 of 2025 DISPOSING OF THE W.P., WITHOUT COSTS