I • APHC010297572025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF AUGUST - TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT ^ THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR WRIT PETITION NO: 14732 OF RAO t Between: P Krishna Sagar, S/o P.Srinivasulu Business, D.No. 10-246, District. Naidu, a/a 50 Kamma Street, Madanapalle Town, years, Cultivation and Annamayya ...Petitioner AND 1. The Principal Secretary for RevenS^ for the State of Andhra Pradesh, District. 2. The District Collector, Annamayya't)istrict, 3. The Joint Collector, Annamayya District, 4. The Sub Collector, Madanapalle, Annamayya District. 5. The Tahsildhar, Madanapalle, Annamayya District. for the State of Andhra Pradesh, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur Rayachoti. Rayachoti. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, pleased to issue a writ or order the High Court may be direction more particularly one in nature of nt of mandamus by directing the Respondent revenue mutations with issuance of revenue Petitioner relating to the Nos.2 to 5 to mutate the pass book in favour of the viz., Annamayya District - schedule property A Madanapalle Rural Mandal - Kothapalli Panchayath - bearing Sy No 390-2 Ac.0.50 Cents, Sy.No.390-5, Ac.0.45 Cents, Sy.No.SS/^z, Ac.0.31 Sy.Noj387-3, Ac.0.40 Cents, Sy.No.391-4, Ac.0.32 Cents, Ac.0.02 Cents by disposing the on-line application submitted by me through Grievance No.RSANMY20241219361, Dt. 19.12:2024 by taking into consideration of bonafides of the Petitioner. ' lA NO: 1 OF 70'?^ Petition under Section. 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents 2 to 5, for conducting enquiry to give report of disposal for the representation submitted by me through on-line application Grievance No. RSANMY20241219361. Dt. 19.12.2024 pending disposal of the present Writ Petition. , Cents, Sy.No.391-3.' non Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI P VASU SEKHAR Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following order: V.-'- APHC010297572025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] H TUESDAY,THE NINETEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 14732/2025 Between: 1.P KRISHNA SAGAR, S/0 P.SRINIVASULU NAIDU, A/A 50 BUSINESS, D.NO.10-246, ANNAMAYYA YEARS, CULTIVATION AND KAMMA STREET, MADANAPALLE TOWN DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1.THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY FOR REVENUE FOR THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, FOR THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2.THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT, RAYACHOTI. 3.THE JOINT COLLECTOR, , ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT, RAYACHOTI. 4.THE SUB COLLECTOR, MADANAPALLE, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT. 5.THE TAHSILDHAR, DISTRICT. SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, MADANAPALLE, ANNAMAYYA ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a writ or order or direction more particularly one in nature of writ of mandamus by directing the Respondent Nos.2 to 5 to mutate the revenue mutations with issuance of revenue pass book in favour of the Petitioner relating to the schedule property viz., Annamayya District - Madanapalle Rural Mandal - Kothapalli Panchayath - bearing Sy.No.390-2, Ac.0.50 Cents, Sy.No.390-5, Ac.0.45 Cents, Sy.No.387-2, Ac.0.31 Cents, Sy.No.387- 3, Ac.0.40 Cents, Sy.No.391-4, Ac.0.32 Cents, Sy.No.391-3, Ac.0.02 Cents by disposing the on-line application submitted by me through Grievance No.RSANMY20241219361, Dt. 19.12.2024 by taking into consideration of bonafides of the Petitioner, and to pass lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased praying that in the 2 Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.P VASU SEKHAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR REVENUE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No.14732 of 2025 THE ORDER;- Pithily this writ petition is filed on the ground that representation the authorities, but it was not dated 19.12.2024 was made to addressed. Therefore, it is urged that the respondents be directed to such direction would suffice in the address the representation, as circumstances of the case. The Hon’ble Apex Court in The Government of India vs P. Venkatesh^ held as follows; “...Dispose of the representation mantra is increasingly permeating the judicial process in the High Courts and the Tribunals. Such orders may make for a quick or easy disposal of cases in overburdened adjudicatory institutions. But, they do not service to the cause of justice. The litigant is back again before the Court, as this case shows, having incurred attendant costs and suffered delays of the legal process. This would have been obviated by calling for a counter in the first instance, thereby resulting in finality to the dispute...” 2. This Court is not oblivious of the fact that a Court to authorities, before directing "consideration” of a claim or representation should examine whether the claim or representation is with reference to a whether it is with reference to a "dead" or "stale" issue, stale" issue or dispute, the 3. live" issue or dead" or If it is with reference to a Court/tribunal should put an end to the matter and should not direct (2019) 15 see 613 4 consideration or reconsideration. If the Court to tribunal deciding to direct "consideration" without itself examining the merits, it should make it clear that such consideration will be without prejudice to any contention relating to limitation or delay and laches. Even if the court does not expressly say so, that would be the legal position and effect." 4. Disposal of proceedings by seemingly innocuous orders directing consideration of representation though result in quick or easy disposal of cases in overburdened adjudicatory institutions but such orders do more disservice than service to the cause of justice. 5. However, the respondents are directed that the petitioner’s representation dated 19.12.2024 be considered by examining thoroughly, issue orders accordingly, and communicate the decision to the petitioners. It goes without saying that the entire process will be completed within six (06) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 6. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any. shall stand closed. //TRUE COPY// To, 1. The Principal Secretary for Revenue, State of Andhra Pradesh, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur District. 2. The District Collector, Annamayya District, Rayachoti. 3. The Joint Collector, Annamayya District, 4. The Sub Collector, Madanapalle, Annamayya District. 5. The Tahsildhar, Madanapalle, Annamayya District. 6. One CC to Sri P Vasu Sekhar, Rayachoti. Advocate [OPUC] 7. Two CCs to GP for Revenue, High Court of Andhra 8. Two CD Copies Pradesh [OUT] TF HIGH COURT DATED:19/08/2025 ORDER WP NO. 14732 OF 2025 gT 0: SEP 2025 ^ DISPOSING OF THE W.P., WITHOUT COSTS