IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH 215-2 CWP-3484-2019 Date of Decision: 23.07.2025 HAKAM SINGH ... Petitioner VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ. **** Present: Mr. Jarnail Singh Saneta, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. R.D. Sharma, DAG, Haryana. **** VINOD S. BHARDWAJ, J. (ORAL) Challenge in the present petition is to the selection list (Annexure P-8) for the selection of Group-D posts vide advertisement No.4/2018 (Annexure P-1). At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the instant writ petition has become infructuous. Learned State Counsel has no objection to the same. Disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. (VINOD S. BHARDWAJ) JULY 23, 2025. JUDGE Rajender Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No RAJENDER KUMAR 2025.07.24 06:18 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order