APHC010297142011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3369] THURSDAY,THE ELEVENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 2388/2011 Between: 1. CHAKKA ADHIPATHI RAO, PATNAM BAZAAR, GUNTUR, S/O. CH.LAKSHMINARAYANA R/O. YAMARTHIVARI STREET, PATNAM BAZAAR, GUNTUR. ...PETITIONER AND 1. GRANDHI SESHAMAMBA DIED REP BY LEGAL R GUNTUR ANR PP, HER LEGAL REPRESNTATIVE G.VARAPARASADA RAO,S/O.VENKATAPPAIAH R/O. D.NO. 23-6-47, FIRST FLOOR, PATNAM BAZAAR, GUNTUR. 2. THE STATE OF A P, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT BUILDINGS, HYDERABAD. ...RESPONDENT(S): Revision filed under Section 397/401 of CrPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the CriminalRevisionCase, the High Court may be pleased toto present this memorandum of grounds of revision case before this Hon'ble Court against the order passed in Crl.MP.No. 167 of 2011 in CC.No.107 of 2003 on the file of the court of Special Judicial First Class Magistrate for Prohibition and Excise, Guntur District dated 22-10-2011. IA NO: 1 OF 2011(CRLRCMP 3600 OF 2011 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to 2 stay all further proceedings including appearance of the petitioner in C.C.No.107 of 2003 on the file of the court of Special Judicial First Class Magistrate for Prohibition and Excise, Guntur, pending the criminal revision case in this Hon'ble Court. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. RAJA REDDY KONETI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. S SATYANARAYANA MOORTHY 2. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 2388/2011 ORDER:- This Criminal Revision Case is filed under Sections 397 and 401 of Cr.P.C. aggrieved by the order dated 22.10.2011 passed in Crl.M.P.No.4956 of 2011 in C.C.No.107 of 2003 passed by the learned Special Judicial I Class Magistrate for Prohibition and Excise, Guntur. 2. Heard. Perused the record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the matter has become infructuous. 4. Considering the submissions made, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as infructuous. Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, in the Criminal Revision Case, shall stand closed. ____________________________ JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO Dated: 11.09.2025 SCH 4 19 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 2388 OF 2011 Dated: 11.09.2025 SCH 5 HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH : AT AMARAVATI CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO:2388 OF 2011 PROCEEDING SHEET SL. NO. DATE ORDER OFFICE NOTE 02. 11.09.2025 TMR, J The Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as infructuous. (Vide Separate Order) ______ TMR, J SCH