1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.11451 of 2025 ----- Tajmul Ansari, son of Shahadat Ansari @ Mian, resident of Dudhani, PO Karanjo, PS Margomunda, District Deoghar … Petitioner(s). Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party(s). CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J. ------ For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ankit Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mrs. Priya Shrestha, Spl. PP (through V.C.) …...... 03 /19.02.2026: This bail application has been filed under Sections 483 & 484 of BNSS, 2023 wherein, prayer has been made for grant of bail as he is in custody for allegedly committing offence punishable under Sections 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2) and 61(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Sections 66(B), 66(C), 66(D) and 84(C) of the Information & Technology Amendment Act. 2. Heard, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the State and have also gone through the impugned order. 3. Learned APP opposes the prayer for bail. 4. Since the mobile phone recovered from the possession of this petitioner was used for committing cyber-crime which is apparent from the impugned order as links of the mobile number were found in the NCCRP portal and IMEI number of the mobiles recovered from the petitioner shows online financial fraud, I am not inclined to grant privilege of bail to the petitioner. 5. Accordingly, the prayer for bail of the petitioner in connection with Deoghar (Cyber) PS Case No. 130 of 2025, pending in the Court of learned Additional Sessions Judge II cum Cyber Crime, Deoghar stands rejected. 2 6. Accordingly, this bail application is dismissed. 7. The petitioner is at liberty to renew his prayer for grant of bail, after framing of the charge. (ANANDA SEN, J.) 19.02.2026 Tanuj/CP-2 Uploaded on 24.02.2026