IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT 213 Sat Pal Sharma State of Punjab CORAM: HON Present : AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) 1. the petitioner on the delayed retiral benefits, 2. reply filed Fatehpur, Pathankot, dated 05.07.2022, states that released within 6 months not entitled to any interest in terms of the Instructions dated 10.01.1991 which provides the afores 3. even during th substantiate the claim. 4. 30.07.2025 parveen kumar Whether Whether reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Sat Pal Sharma Versus f Punjab and Others CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Mr. Rajeev Dev Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Swapan Shorey, DAG, Punjab. AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) Prayer made is for directing the respondents to pay interest the petitioner on the delayed retiral benefits, Learned State counsel, while referring to para 3 on merits of filed by way of affidavit of the Headmaster, Govt. High School, Fatehpur, Pathankot, dated 05.07.2022, states that released within 6 months of the retirement not entitled to any interest in terms of the Instructions dated 10.01.1991 which provides the aforesaid period for the said purpose. There is neither any replication filed nor could it be rebutted during the course of arguments, or substantiate the claim. In view of the above, the present petition is dismissed. Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-3654-2022 (O & M) Date of decision: 30.07.2025 ....Petitioner ...Respondents BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Advocate, Mr. Swapan Shorey, DAG, Punjab. Prayer made is for directing the respondents to pay interest to the petitioner on the delayed retiral benefits, who retired on 31.05.2020. Learned State counsel, while referring to para 3 on merits of by way of affidavit of the Headmaster, Govt. High School, Fatehpur, Pathankot, dated 05.07.2022, states that the amounts were of the retirement and as such, the petitioner is not entitled to any interest in terms of the Instructions dated 10.01.1991, aid period for the said purpose. There is neither any replication filed nor could it be rebutted e course of arguments, or any argument raised to In view of the above, the present petition is dismissed. (AMAN CHAUDHARY) JUDGE PARVEEN KUMAR 2025.08.02 15:12 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.