Yadala Subbalakshmi, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,
WP/15187/2025 · 2025-06-24
Harinath N
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 21069 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 21069 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010297422025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY,THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSANDAND TWENTYFIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 15187 OF 2025 Between: Yadala Subbalakshmi, W/o Chinna Sattibabu, Age- 49 years, Occ- Housewife, R/o. H.No.7-18, Avulamanda Village, Thondangi Mandal Kakinada District, Andhra Pradesh ...Petitioner AND
1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its PrI. Secretary, Home deportment Secretariat, Velagapudi, East Godavari District, Andhra Pradesh. 2. The Superintendent of Police, Kakinada District, at Kakinada Andhra Pradesh. 3. The Sub-Divisional Police officer, Tuni, Kakinada District, Andhra Pradesh. 4. The Station House officer, Thondangi Police Station, Kakinada District, Andhra Pradesh. 5. Arugula Govind, S/o. Sattibabu, Age 33 years Occ- Technician, R/o. Avulamanda Village, Thondangi Mandal, Kakinada District, Andhra Pradesh. 6. Arugula Srinu, S/o. Sattibabu, Age 30 years Occ- Technician, R/o. Avulamanda Village, Thondangi Mandal, Kakinada District, Andhra Pradesh. «fv
7. Arugula Varahalu, S/o. Subbarao, Age 23 years Occ- Labour, R/o. Avulamanda Village, Thondangi Mandal, Kakinada District, Andhra Pradesh. 8. Arugula Manikanta, S/o. Devudu, Age 25 years Occ- Labour, R/o. Avulamanda Village, Thondangi Mandal, Kakinada District, Andhra Pradesh. 9. Arugula Siva Krishna, S/o. Devudu, Age 22 years Occ- Labour, R/o. Avulamanda Village, Thondangi Mandal, Kakinada District, Andhra Pradesh. 10. Arugula Sattibabu, S/o. Adaiah, Age 55 years Occ- Agriculture, R/o. Avulamanda Village, Thondangi Mandal, Kakinada District, Andhra Pradesh. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, by declaring the action of the 4th respondent in not taking necessary action against the respondents No. 5 to 10, basing on the report of the petitioner, dated 28-04-2025 by providing protection to the petitioner and her family members, as illegal and arbitrary and against the principles of natural justice and violative of Article 14,19 and 21 of Constitution of India and consequently to direct the respondent. No. 2 to 4 to take necessary action against the respondents No. 5 to 10 as per law, basing on the report of the petitioner, dated 28-04-2025, by providing protection to the petitioner and her family members.
lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to direct the respondent. No. 2 to 4 to take necessary action against the respondents No. 5 to 10 as per law, basing on the report of the
11. petitioner, dated 28-04-Pn9*; k. counsel for the Respondents No.5 to 8: None The Court made the following Order: her KOTTE HOME appeared
1 HN, J W.P.No.15187 2025 APHC010297422025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] WEDNESDAY,THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 15187/2025 Between: ...PETITIONER Yadala Subbalakshmi, AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.CHENNAKESAVULU KOTTE Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.GP FOR HOME
2 HN, J W.P.No.l5187_2025 f' The Court made the following Order:
1. Heard. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the respondent No. 4 is not acting on the petitioner’s representation dated 28.04.2025. 3. The learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing for the Home Department submits that the petitioner’s representation dated 28.04.2025 will be considered by the respondents, as per the law. 4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to disposed off the Writ Petition at the stage of admission itself, directing the respondent No.4 to consider the petitioner’s representation dated 28.04.2025, leaving it open to the petitioner to file a fresh representation to the 4^'' respondent. Upon receipt of such representation, the 4 respondent shall consider it in accordance with law and as per the procedure contemplated under Section 173(3) of the Bharatiya Nagarik th Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, (for short, “BNSS”). As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- P. VINOD KUMAR ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ^ SECTION OFFICER //TRUE COPY// To,
1. The PrI. Secretary, Home Department Secretariat, Velagapudi, East Godavari District, Andhra Pradesh. 2. The Superintendent of Police, Kakinada District, at Kakinada Andhra Pradesh. 3. The Sub-Divisional Police officer, Tuni, Kakinada District, Andhra Pradesh. 4.
The Station House officer, Thondangi Police Station, Kakinada District, Andhra Pradesh. 5. One CC to Sri Chennakesavulu Kotte, Advocate [OPUC]
6. Two CCs to GP for Home, High Court of Andhra Pradesh.[OUT]
7. Two CD Copies VNA
HIGH COURT DATED:25/06/2025 ORDER W.P.No.15187/2025 DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS