Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 210663 (MAD)

M.Ajeesha Banu v. The State of Tamilnadu Rep.by

WP Crl.(MD)/2125/2025 · 2025-11-19

Sunder Mohan

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

W.P.Crl.(MD)No.2125 of 2025 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 19.11.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN W.P.Crl.(MD).No.2125 of 2025 M.Ajeesha Banu ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The State of Tamilnadu Rep.By, The Superintendent of Police, Office of the Superintendent of Police, Ramanathapuram District. 2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Office of the Superintendent of Police, Keelakarai, Ramanathapuram District. 3.The Inspector of Police, Thirupullani Police Station, Ramanathapuram District. 4.Mariam Thaha 5.Sahubar Nisha 6.Abdul Kadhar ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 1 to 3 respondents herein not to interfere with the civil dispute between the petitioner 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.Crl.(MD)No.2125 of 2025 and the 4 to 6 respondents by considering the petitioners representation/complaint dt 10.11.2025 with respect to the property comprised in S.No.88/7, 88/8 and 88/6A3 in Thinaikulam Village, Kalimnkundu Group, Ramnathapuram District until the final adjudication in the civil suit. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Vashik Ali For R1 to R3 : Mr.R.M.Anbunithi, Additional Public Prosecutor ORDER This Writ Petition has been filed seeking a direction to the respondents 1 to 3 herein not to interfere with the civil dispute between the petitioner and the respondents 4 to 6 by considering the petitioner's representation/complaint, dated 10.11.2025. 2. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor, on instructions, would submit that an enquiry was conducted earlier on the complaint given by the respondents 4 to 6 and the same was closed as it discloses only a civil dispute. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner however would state that the second respondent is still interfering in the dispute. 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.Crl.(MD)No.2125 of 2025 4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor on instructions would further submit that the respondents 1 to 3 would not interfere in any civil dispute between the petitioner and the private respondents. 5. Recording the aforesaid submission, this Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. 19.11.2025 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No Indu/ars To 1.The Superintendent of Police, Office of the Superintendent of Police, Ramanathapuram District. 2.The Deputy Superintendent Of Police, Office of the Superintendent of Police, Keelakarai, Ramanathapuram District. 3.The Inspector of Police, Thirupullani Police Station, Ramanathapuram District. 4.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.Crl.(MD)No.2125 of 2025 SUNDER MOHAN, J. Indu W.P.Crl.(MD).No.2125 of 2025 19.11.2025 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis