Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 21066 (MAD)

R. Sakthivel v. Malarvizhi and Another

CONT P/642/2025 · 2025-06-06

Battu Devanand

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Contempt Petition No. 642 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 06.06.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND Contempt Petition No. 642 of 2025 R. Sakthivel ... Petitioner Vs. 1.Malarvizhi, Dharmapuri District Central Co-operative Bank Ltd., Spcial Officer/The Joint Registrar of Co-operative Societies, Dharmapuri Circle, Dharmapuri. 2.Saravanan, The Joint Registrar of Co-operatives/Chairman, District Recruitment Board, Dharmapuri District. ... Respondents PRAYER: Contempt Petition is filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, to punish the respondents herein for willful disobedience of the order of this Court dated 10.10.2023 in W.P. No. 8819 of 2021. For Petitioner : Mr. R. Kamalanathan For Respondents : Mr. A. Praveen Kumar, for R1 Mr. R. Neelakandan, Additional Advocate General Asst. by Mrs. Geetha Thamaraiselvan for R2 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Contempt Petition No. 642 of 2025 O R D E R This Contempt Petition has been filed complaining wilful disobedience of the respondents in complying the order dated 10.10.2023 in W.P. No. 8819 of 2021. 2. While allowing the said writ petition, this Court directed the respondent therein to issue appointment order to the petitioner, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of copy of that order. 3. During the course of hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the respondents would submit that the order of the Court is complied with by issuing appointment order to the petitioner in R.C.No. 073/2025/P4 dated 05.06.2025 and she further submits that the petitioner joined in service also. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner also endorsed the same. 4. In view of the above factual position, as the order of the Court is complied with, in our considered view, no further adjudication is not required in the present contempt case. 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Contempt Petition No. 642 of 2025 5. Accordingly, this Contempt Petition is closed. 06.06.2025 Index :Yes/No Neutral Citation: Yes/No AT 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Contempt Petition No. 642 of 2025 BATTU DEVANAND, J. AT Contempt Petition No.642 of 2025 06.06.2025 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis