BHARAT ELECTRONICS LIMITED v. PANKAJ AILANI, S/O KRISHNAN KUMAR AILANI
SAW/636/2025 · 2025-06-30
Maneesh Sharma, Manindra Mohan Shrivastava
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 21062 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 21062 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:23739-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Special Appeal Writ No. 636/2025 Bharat Electronics Limited, Through Its Chairman And Managing Director, Mr. Manoj Jain, Having Its Registered Office At Outer Ring Road, Nagavara, Bengaluru, Karnataka - 560045. At Present Through Authorized Representative Davinder Kumar Singla S/o Shri Raj Kumar Singla, Aged About 49 Years, Working As Senior Deputy General Manager (Hr And A), Having Its Registered Office At Outer Ring Road, Nagavaria, Bengaluru, Karnataka - 560045. ----Appellant Versus
1. Pankaj Ailani, S/o Krishnan Kumar Ailani, R/o 33-A, Nagar Parishad Colony, Kanwar Nagar, Jaipur - 302002 (Rajasthan)
2. Ministry Of Defence, Department Of Defence Production, Government Of India, Through Its Joint Secretary, Shri Rajeev Prakash, Having Its Office At 134-B, South Block, New Delhi - 110011.
3. Union Of India, Through Its Defence Secretary, Shri Rajesh Kumar Singh, Having Its Office At 101-A, South Block, New Delhi - 110011. ----Respondents For Appellant(s) : Mr. Manish Paliwal with Mr. Aman Modi For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rakesh Choudhary with Mr. Siddhant Jain Mr. Pankaj Ailani, respondent No.1 present in person HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANEESH SHARMA
Order 30/06/2025
1. Though number of grounds have been urged, taking into
consideration that the interim order is with liberty to apply for
[2025:RJ-JP:23739-DB] (2 of 2) [SAW-636/2025] vacating stay, we are of the view that the petitioner-appellant, instead of filing appeal, should have taken recourse to remedy of moving an application for vacating stay on those grounds which are available to him including the grounds raised in this appeal.
2. The appeal is dismissed with the aforesaid liberty. Pending application, if any, also stands dismissed.
(MANEESH SHARMA),J (MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA),CJ KAMLESH KUMAR-RAHUL/21