Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 21062 (GAU)

DIMBESWAR PATHAK v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS

WP(C)/5851/2014 · 2025-01-08

Devashis Baruah

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010250052014 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/5851/2014 DIMBESWAR PATHAK S/O- SRI ARABINDA PATHAK, R/O- KHARGHULI, GHY- 4. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS REP. BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECY., GUWAHATI DEVELOPMENT DEPTT., GHY- 6. 2:THE GUWAHATI METROPOLITAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY REP. BY THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER BHANGAGARH GHY- 5. 3:THE GUWAHATI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION REP. BY ITS COMMISSIONER PANBAZAR GHY- 1. 4:THE MAYOR GUWAHATI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION UZANBAZAR GHY- 1 For the Petitioner(s) : Ms. B. Roy, Advocate For the Respondent(s) : Mr. S. Bora, Standing Counsel Page No.# 2/2 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH ORDER Date : 09.01.2025 Ms. B. Roy, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner submitted that the Petitioner has already vacated the quarter pursuant to the issuance of notice by the GMDA Authorities. Therefore, nothing remains in the writ petition. 2. Taking into account the above, the instant writ petition stands closed as it has become infructuous. 3. Interim order passed if any, stands vacated. JUDGE Comparing Assistant