APHC010297492020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY,THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 19715 OF 2020 Between: 1. M/s. Proddatur Oils Pvt. Ltd.,, Rep. by its Director Sri Satresala Balaji, Reg. Office Nio.12-13-829/C, Flat No.104, Sai Balaji Residency, Streetn No.11, Tarnaka, Secunderabad. 2. Satresala Balaji,, S/ o. Srinivasulu R/o. D.No.42/28A, NGO colony, Proddatur Town, YSR Kadapa District. 3. Satrasala Haritha,, W/o. Satresala Balaji, Aged about 47 years, Occ. Business, R/o. D.No.42/28A, NGO colony, Proddatur Town, YSR Kadapa District. 4. Satrasala Srinivasulu,, S/ o. Papaiah, Aged about 84 years, Occ. Business, R/o. D.No.42/28A, NGO colony, Proddatur T6wn, YSR Kadapa District 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by Principal Secretary, Home Department, A.P. Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur District. 2. The Superintendent of Police, YSR Kadapa District, Kadapa. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY,THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA PETITION NO: 19715 OF 2020 1. M/s. Proddatur Oils Pvt. Ltd.,, Rep. by its Director Sri Satresala Balaji, Reg. 829/C, Flat No.104, Sai Balaji Residency, Streetn No.11, 2. Satresala Balaji,, S/ o. Srinivasulu, Aged about 53 years, Occ. Business, R/o. D.No.42/28A, NGO colony, Proddatur Town, YSR Kadapa District. 3. Satrasala Haritha,, W/o. Satresala Balaji, Aged about 47 years, Occ. Business, R/o. D.No.42/28A, NGO colony, Proddatur Town, YSR Kadapa 4. Satrasala Srinivasulu,, S/ o. Papaiah, Aged about 84 years, Occ. Business, R/o. D.No.42/28A, NGO colony, Proddatur T6wn, YSR Kadapa District ...Petitioners AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by Principal Secretary, Home ariat, Velagapudi, Guntur District. 2. The Superintendent of Police, YSR Kadapa District, Kadapa. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH THURSDAY,THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF AUGUST THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA 1. M/s. Proddatur Oils Pvt. Ltd.,, Rep. by its Director Sri Satresala Balaji, Reg. 829/C, Flat No.104, Sai Balaji Residency, Streetn No.11, , Aged about 53 years, Occ. Business, R/o. D.No.42/28A, NGO colony, Proddatur Town, YSR Kadapa District. 3. Satrasala Haritha,, W/o. Satresala Balaji, Aged about 47 years, Occ. Business, R/o. D.No.42/28A, NGO colony, Proddatur Town, YSR Kadapa 4. Satrasala Srinivasulu,, S/ o. Papaiah, Aged about 84 years, Occ. Business, R/o. D.No.42/28A, NGO colony, Proddatur T6wn, YSR Kadapa District ...Petitioners 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by Principal Secretary, Home 2 3. The Station House Officer, Proddatur Rural Police Station, Proddatur Town, YSR Kadapa District. 4. Yellipalem Sudershan Reddy, S/o. Pulla Reddy, Aged about 51 years, Occ. Business, R/o. D.No.15/487-2, Balaji Nagar-2, Proddatur Town, YSR Kadapa District. 5. Chinnari kuppam Damodar, S/o. Adhi kesavulu Nayudu, Aged about 54 years, Occ. Business, R/ o. D. No.10-280- 58 Sri Sai Rajeswari colony, Proddutur, YSR Kadapa District. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased tobe pleased to issue order or direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondent No.3 in registering F.I.R. No.303 of 2020 and calling the Petitioners to the Police Station and pressurizing them to settle the civil disputes pending in O.S. No 91 of 2016 on the file of Prl. District Judge, YSR District for recovery of the amount and pressurizing to repay the suit amount as illegal, arbitrary, violation of Principles of Natural Justice and violation of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently set-aside the F.I.R. and direct the Respondent No.3 not to interfere into the personal life and liberty of the Petitioners IA NO: 1 OF 2020 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the Respondent No.3 not to call the Petitioners to the Police Station and not to pressurize the Petitioners to settle the Civil Suit in O.S. No. 3 91 of 2016 by interfering into their right to life and personal liberty and pass such other IA NO: 2 OF 2020 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to stay all further proceedings including the arrest of the Petitioners in FIR No. 303 of 2020 on the file of Proddatur Rural Police Station, Proddatur Town, YSR Kadapa District and pass such other order Counsel for the Petitioners: P S P SURESH KUMAR Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondents:C PRAKASH REDDY The Court made the following order: 4 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 19715 OF 2020 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…pleased to issue order or direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondent No.3 in registering F.I.R. No.303 of 2020 and calling the Petitioners to the Police Station and pressurizing them to settle the civil disputes pending in O.S. No 91 of 2016 on the file of Prl. District Judge, YSR District for recovery of the amount and pressurizing to repay the suit amount as illegal, arbitrary, violation of Principles of Natural Justice and violation of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently set-aside the F.I.R. and direct the Respondent No.3 not to interfere into the personal life and liberty of the Petitioners…” 2. None represented for the petitioner. 3. When the matter is taking up for hearing, the learned Assistant Government Pleader would submit that in compliance with the orders passed by this Court in I.A.No.02 of 2020 dated 22.10.2020, the police have duly issued notice under Section 41-A Cr.P.C against the petitioner. 4. The learned counsel for the unofficial respondent would submit that a civil suit is pending between the parties and in the meanwhile, the matter has been settled between them. 5 5. Recording the aforesaid submissions, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 21.08.2025. KKV 6 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.19715 of 2020 Dated.21.08.2025 KKV 81