DEVENDRA KUMAR YADAV v. DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, GATAM BUDHA NAGAR AND 2 OTHERS
WRIC/5272/2025 · 2025-05-04
Anish Kumar Gupta, Manoj Kumar Gupta
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 21062 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 21062 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:71319-DB HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD ***** (Sl No.50) Court No. - 21 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 5272 of 2025 Petitioner :- Devendra Kumar Yadav Respondent :- District Magistrate, Gatam Budha Nagar And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Shiv Prakash Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Manoj Kumar Gupta,J. Hon'ble Anish Kumar Gupta,J.
1. The prayer made in the instant petition is for issuing a writ of mandamus commanding the respondents to permit the petitioner to start his Bore Well and RO Plant and to decide the representation of the petitioner dated 27.01.2025.
2. The petitioner is running a RO Plant by drawing water from a Bore Well.
3. Learned Standing Counsel has placed on record the instructions received from District Magistrate- Gautam Buddh Nagar, according to which the petitioner does not have any permission for running the Bore Well which is of four inch diametre nor for operating the RO Plant.
4. Sri Anand Kumar Singh, Advocate holding brief of Sri S.P. Tiwari, counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of the writ petition to enable the petitioner to obtain necessary approvals.
5. Accordingly, the petition stands disposed of as not pressed with
liberty to the petitioner to apply for necessary approvals. Order Date :- 5.5.2025 Shubham Arya (Anish Kumar Gupta, J.) (Manoj Kumar Gupta, J.) Digitally signed by :- SHUBHAM ARYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad