Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 21060 (KAR)

SATISH v. ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR

WP/9199/2020 · 2025-04-04

Suraj Govindaraj

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:15489 WP No. 9199 of 2020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF APRIL, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 9199 OF 2020 (CS-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SATISH S/O NAGRAJU AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS 2. NAGARAJU M S/O LATE MOTAPPA AGED ABOUT 76 YEARS BOTH ARE RESIDING AT NO.58/1 12TH MAIN, 7TH CROSS, SHAKAMBARINAGAR J P NAGAR 1ST PHASE BANGALORE - 560 078 …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. V.G. BHANUPRAKASH, ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) AND: 1. ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR REGISTRAR OF CO OPERATIVE SOCIETIES GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA ALI ASKER ROAD, NEAR RAJ BHAVAN, VASANTH NAGAR BANGALORE - 560 052 2. THE KARNATAKA STATE CO-OPERATIVE MARKETING FEDERATION LTD NO.3, S KARIYAPPA ROAD Digitally signed by SHWETHA RAGHAVENDRA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:15489 WP No. 9199 of 2020 BASAVANGUDI BANGALORE - 560 004 REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. YOGESH D. NAIK, AGA FOR R1 SRI. N. RAMACHANDRA, ADVOCATE FOR R2) THIS W.P. FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DTD. 13.03.2020 BY WHICH THE R-1 REJECTED THE APPLICATION OF THE PETITIONER TO RECALL THE EX-PARTE ORDER IN DISPUTE NO.AN (H & M) D2/MD/522/2012-13 AS IN ANNEXURE-J AND CONSEQUENTLY ALLOW THE APPLICATION, DIRECT THE R-1 TO HEAR THE DISPUTE FILED BY THE R-2 AS IN ANEXURE-D A FRESH AND DIRECT THE R-1 TO PASS ORDERS IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW, GRANT AN INTERIM ORDER TO STAY THE OPERATION OF THE AWARD DATED 23.06.2018 PASSED BY THE R-1 IN DISPUTE AS IN ANEXURE- E. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ ORAL ORDER 1. The petitioners are before this Court, seeking for the following reliefs: "a. Issue of Writ of Certiorari and quash the order dated: 13.03.2020 by which the 1st Respondent rejected the application of the petitioner to recall the ex-parte order in dispute No.AN(H&M) D2/MD/522/2012-13 as in Annexure -J and consequently allow the application. b. Issue of Writ of Mandamus and direct the first respondent to hear the dispute filed by the second respondent as in Annexure-D a fresh and direct the - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:15489 WP No. 9199 of 2020 first respondent to pass orders in accordance with law. c. Grant such other relief / reliefs as this Hon'ble Court deems it fit and appropriate on the facts and in the Circumstances of the case, including costs of this petition, to meet the ends of justice." 2. Despite the order dated 14.03.2025, today also there is no appearance on the part of the petitioners, nor have office objections been complied with. 3. It appears that petitioners are not interested in prosecuting the matter. Hence, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. SD/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE AMA List No.: 1 Sl No.: 3